Textbook Notes (368,122)
Canada (161,660)
Sociology (1,053)
SOCA01H3 (480)
Chapter 1

Sociology chapter 1.docx

9 Pages
84 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Sociology
Course
SOCA01H3
Professor
Robert Brym
Semester
Fall

Description
Chapter 1 A Sociological Compass Introduction: why need a compass for a new world According to Aboriginals, Gluskap is the creator of the world. Bryms cleaning lady, Lena taught him about harmony among humans and between humans and nature. In school Brym learned about the European exploration of the New World. They glorified the conquest of nature, and while exciting; it lacked truth in its violent nature. Today, with advancements in technology we too are excited about the New World. However, our world is also dreadful with many diseases and violence. We need a sociological compass in order to find our place in the world, and see ourselves as part of a larger group. Goals of this Chapter To show that social relations powerfully influence suicide rates Chart a better course for society and analyzing the work of founders of sociology Help you understand your century and society 1.1 The Sociological Perspective Suicide correlates with sociology because: o It is related to everyone in society o Its committed in private o It is rare, 2006 10.8 suicides per 100,000 people in CA. compared to world average of 16 suicides per 100,000 people. o We think about the state of mind rather than societal causes The Sociological Explanation of Suicide Emile Durkheim proved that social forces strongly influence suicide rates. He examined the association between rates of suicide and rates of psychological disorder for different groups. Psychological disorders are high = suicide caused by psychological disorder He found: more women in insane asylums, however 4 male suicides per female suicide, Jews has highest rate of psychological disorder than other religious groups in France, but they had lowest suicide rate, psychological disorders occur at start of adulthood, but suicide rates increase with age. Durkheim said suicide rates vary because of difference in the degree of social solidarity o (1) the degree to which group members share beliefs and values o (2) the intensity and frequency of their interaction in different categories of the population Greater degree of beliefs/ values = more interaction = more social solidarity More solidarity = less suicide rates Less solidarity= more suicide rates Married people half likely to commit suicide because of social ties. Women less likely since they are involved in family life. Jews are less likely than Christians because of persecution; theyre close knit. Older adults more likely because theyre lonely, jobless, lost spouse & friends Suicide in Canada Today Durkheim- suicide rate declines and then rises as social solidarity increases. Strong social bonds decrease the probability that a person will commit suicide if adversity. High solidarity = altruistic suicide Eg. Soldiers who die to protect soldiers Low solidarity = egoistic suicide-weak social ties Eg. Unemployed = anomic suicide-vague norms govern behaviour Eg. Society lacking morality Canada differs from France + suicide is common today due to social solidarity Moral principles and social ties eroded during the 1960s: o Religious service attendance decreased Unemployment is up, especially for youth up to twice as high. Rate of divorce increased Social solidarity is lower, especially for youth since less society, morality. From Personal Troubles to Social Structures Social structures are relatively stable patterns of social relations o 1. Microstructures are the patterns of relatively intimate social relations formed during face-to-face interaction. Families, friendship circles, and work associations are all examples. Eg. People with weak connected are more likely to know different groups of people will help you land a job o 2. Macrostructures are overarching patterns of social relations that lie outside and above your circle of intimates and acquaintances. It includes classes, bureaucracies and power systems, such as patriarchy. Eg. Government providing support for working moms who have to do more work such as taking care of children, household, etc. = dissatisfaction in marriage. Equal distribution of responsibilities = happy marriage. o 3. Global structures are patterns of social relations that lie outside and above the national level. They include international organizations, patterns of worldwide travel and communication, and the economic relations between countries. Eg. Charities dont solve world problems The Sociological Imagination C.W. Mills: Sociological imagination the quality of mind that enables a person to see the connection between personal troubles and social structures. In the past, philosophers believed God and nature controlled society not sociological. They focused on what an ideal society should look like rather than how society works.Origins of the Sociological Imagination The scientific revolution began about 1550. It encouraged the view that sound conclusions about the workings of society must be based on solid evidence, not just on speculation. o Eg. Using evidence to make a case for a point of view like when Galileo made observations through his telescope that fit Copernicuss theory. The democratic revolution began about 1750. It suggested that people are responsible for organizing society and that human intervention can therefore solve social problems. o Eg. Thus a science of society could improve it like in Europe and North America that were shook by this revolution. The industrial revolution the most important event in world history since the development of agriculture and cities, refers to the rapid economic transformation that began in Britain in the 1780s. It involved the large-scale application of science and technology to industrial processes, the creation of factories, and the formation of a working class. o Eg. Working long hours, losing religion, poverty, strikes, crime, wars. Thus people could intervene to improve society. 1.2 Theory, Research and Values Auguste Comte coined the term sociology in 1838 he wanted to see the social world for what it was. He wanted to adopt a scientific method for studying sociology but he was conservative, thus his opposition to change in society was evi
More Less

Related notes for SOCA01H3

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit