MSL NOTES ON READING #21 - DOWN ON MAIN STREET: DRUGS AND THE SMAL-TOWN VORTEX

112 views8 pages
School
Department
Course
MSL READING #21: DOWN ON MAIN STREET: DRUGS AND
THE SMALL-TOWN VORTEX BY: PAUL DRAUS & ROBERT G.
CARLSON (p. 218-234)
๎€One type of social deviance, according to sociologists, is crime.
๎€If deviance is the violation of a social norm, then a crime is the violation of
social norms that have been made into laws.
Introduction: Small-Town America, Social Networks, and Substance Abuse
๎€As in the inner city, illegal drugs have a home in rural America.
๎€The abuse of mind-altering substances in small towns and rural areas is no
novelty and should come as no surprise.
๎€Nonetheless, the belief in a rural-urban divide, in regards to drug use and other
issues, persists.
๎€While the city environment is often characterized by a higher degree of
anonymity and more liberal attitudes toward individual behaviour, the small
town is presumed to possess a level of unavoidable intimacy, in which the
individual is constantly confronted with the familiar.
๎€Cities are seen as places where people are physically proximate but
socially distant, while in rural areas the situation is reversed.
๎€The closeness of social relations and the homogeneity of values in more
rural areas, it is commonly believed, place distinct limits on individual
behaviour.
๎€Some scholars have proposed that high degrees of network interconnection and
reciprocity, or โ€œsocial capitalโ€ have an inverse effect in levels of crime and high-
risk health behaviours, including illegal drug abuse.
๎€Small towns are symbolically equated with the presence of high social capital,
with โ€œimagined geographiesโ€ of reciprocal care and control.
๎€They are often the unstated norm that the โ€œdeviantโ€ inner city is defined
against.
๎€The moral geography of small towns is idealized, and โ€œdeviantโ€ behaviours such
as illicit drug dealing and using are defined as essentially โ€œout of placeโ€.
๎€Thus, the dominant myth of the โ€œrural idyllโ€ serves to obscure the presence of
rural social marginality and also to preclude research among those most affected
by it.
๎€There is a dark โ€œunderbellyโ€ to the dominant โ€œsocial capital narrativeโ€: the
communityโ€™s belief that in its own imperviousness to problems of alienated you
caused them to overlook signs of trouble that seemed obvious in retrospect.
www.notesolution.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 8 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
๎€The same might be said of other social problems, such as illicit drug dealing and
abuse, which are often associated with urban areas.
๎€Like inner-city neighbourhoods in the wake of deindustrialization, rural
communities may suffer from the long-term effects of the farm crisis, the
collapse of other traditional industries such as logging or mining, and
accompanying losses of jobs and population.
๎€Illegal drugs are one corollary of rural-urban connectedness, and the
transmission of drug behaviours reflects the shared strains and desires of cities
and small towns.
Content, Composition, and Context
๎€One key theoretical debate concerning the relationship between location or place
and behaviour has to do with the question of context or composition of local social
networks.
๎€Is exposure to illicit drugs and subsequent drug abuse in rural areas
primarily a result of neighbourhood or community-level factors (context),
or is it largely a function of the individual psychologies or personalities
that happen to prevail in this population (composition)?
๎€A relate question pertains to the presence of bridging as opposed to bonding
social capital.
๎€These terms refer to nature of the networks themselves: whether oneโ€™s
social contacts link one to other โ€œlooseโ€ networks and resources or if they
simply tie one tightly into a single, โ€œdenseโ€ network.
๎€There are three crucial dimensions of social networks:
1.That of network structure,
2.That of network content, and
3.That of network function
๎€In the case of drug-using networks, the surface function (that of illicit drug
using) may itself form the basis of social relationships (content) that constitutes
the network (structure).
๎€If these drug-using networks overlap significantly with other networks,
especially those of work, neighbourhood, and family, we might predict that
an individualโ€™s access or exposure to non-drug users would be much more
limited.
โ€ขIn such cases, the tight social networks of the small town might in
fact amplify such behaviours, rather than constrain them.
๎€In fact, the relationship between social capital and health outcomes is not always
positive.
www.notesolution.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 8 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
๎€Some research had found that the impact of social relationships on the
individualsโ€™ mental states and behaviours can vary significantly
depending on the context and characteristics of those relationships.
๎€Some research has shown that social capital that is valuable in one place may
actually serve as an obstacle to integration in the wider society, reinforcing the
idea of being โ€œlocked inโ€.
๎€The same social environment may be experienced very differently by
people occupying different subjective positions within it, and oneโ€™s social
networks are a major component of how one experiences a social milieu.
๎€Social networks profoundly shape the daily social processes that constitute oneโ€™s
tangible experiences and opportunities.
๎€However, much of social networks research is highly quantitative, drawing on
survey and other sources for network data and building complicated
mathematical models.
๎€However, in recent years there have been more attempts to apply
qualitative methods in conjunction with other techniques of network
measurement, investigating โ€œarea effectsโ€ that promote or impede health
within particular communities, and examining the relationships between
people, their environments, and the characteristics of their social
networks.
๎€Qualitative research on the relationship between social networks and substance
use behaviour has also shown distinct differences across contexts.
๎€Research among African American women in rural Florida indicates that local
support networks may moderate the negative effects of addiction, and protective
effects have also been attributed to social networks among urban Latino
adolescents confronting drug use opportunities.
๎€Pre-existing social capital was a valuable resource for middle-class individuals
recovering from addiction.
๎€Qualitative research among smoker in disadvantaged communities in Glasgow
found that social networks and social stressors combined to reinforce smoking
patterns, not reduce them.
๎€Non-injecting heroin user in San Antonio, Texas, had widely varying patterns of
risk behaviour based on their membership in familial or peer networks.
๎€In a sense, these abstracted concepts of social networks, social capital, and social
support might all be seen as elements or dimensions of a larger whole, that
complex and concrete set of lived relations and associations that constitute social
space.
๎€From this perspective, the attempt to analytically separate social
networks from the physical locations where they occur is somewhat beside
the point, as these are all constitutive of a seamless human and social
geography.
www.notesolution.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 8 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Msl read ing #21: down on ma i n street: drugs and. T he small-town vortex by: paul draus & robert g. one type of social deviance, according to sociologists, is crime. if deviance is the violation of a social norm, then a crime is the violation of social norms that have been made into laws. I ntroduction: small-town america, social networks, and substance abuse. as in the inner city, illegal drugs have a home in rural america. the abuse of mind-altering substances in small towns and rural areas is no novelty and should come as no surprise. nonetheless, the belief in a rural-urban divide, in regards to drug use and other issues, persists. cities are seen as places where people are physically proximate but socially distant, while in rural areas the situation is reversed.

Get access

Grade+20% OFF
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers