CRI210H1 Chapter Notes - Chapter 14: Karla Homolka

10 views2 pages
Roberts Ch.14 Plea Bargaining
Only small minority of criminal cases in Canada proceed to a trail
Plea bargaining has been one of the most controversial but least understood practices
Describes a broad range of behaviours that may over among actors in the criminal court
system
One of the most useful definitions: an agreement by the accused to plead guilty in return for
the prosecutor’s agreeing to take or refrain from taking a particular course of action
The term plea agreement is more appropriate than plea bargaining because there is no
guarantee that any agreement will ultimately be carried into effect by the sentence judge, who
isn't bound by any promises made by the Crown to the defence
Some researchers found the term plea negotiations is particular appropriate given the realities
of the criminal justice process
It is feasible for the Crown and the defence counsel to enter into plea agreement
Promises that may be made by Crown counsel fall into three overlapping categories:
1) Promises relating to the nature of the charges to be laid (charge bargaining)
2) Those relating to the ultimate sentence that may be mete out by the Court
(sentence bargaining)
3) Those relating to the facts that the Crown may bring to the attention of the trial
judge (fact bargaining)
The Response of Canadian Judges to Plea Negotiations
In 1995, the Supreme Court of Canada roundly endorsed the view that plea bargaining was
indispensable to the functioning of the Canadian criminal justice system
There is little doubt that the tolerance stance adopted by the Supreme Court of Canada
towards the practice of plea negotiations was firmly embraced by the appellate and trial courts
Why have the courts been willing in more recent years to accept legitimacy of so-called plea
bargaining?
There is perception among many judges and prosectors that without a steady stream
of guilty pleas, the criminal court system would collapse under the weight of a
massive backlog of delayed trials
alleviates the workload of prosecutors, reduces the need for judicial resources and
courtroom facilities and decreases all other expenses necessitated by a trial
Martin Task Force: plea bargaining was no longer a dirty secret hidden in the corridors of the
courtroom but was now openly facilitated in the judges office
In the notorious case of Karla Homolka:
The Crown took the view that it was necessary to offer this plea bargain to Homolka,
who was considered a willing accomplice to the killings of Kristen
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows half of the first page of the document.
Unlock all 2 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents