Textbook Notes (368,035)
Canada (161,583)
History (109)
HIS109Y1 (16)
Chapter

Seminar 8 - The Enlightenment.doc

6 Pages
116 Views
Unlock Document

Department
History
Course
HIS109Y1
Professor
Kenneth Bartlett
Semester
Fall

Description
HIS109Y1 Western Civilizations: p. 516 - 535 & Vol. 2: p. 216 - 238, 244 - 258 & Seminar 8 - The Enlightenment November 19th & November 21st/2012 Perspectives From the Past: p. 216 - 238, 244 - 258 A Philosophical and Political History of the Settlements and Trade of the Europeans Abbe Guillaume-Thomas Raynal - anyone who justifies slavery might as well be the one who tortures the negro - this person would be the enemy of the human race - society is divided into two societies: oppressed and the oppressors - the light of reason and simplistic nature should replace the blind ferocity of our ancestors - banning slavery doesn’t mean that we need to give up luxuries and conveniences; these productions can be cultivated by the hands of free men - until this revolution takes place, negroes will still be oppressed 1) Raynal condemns slavery on humanitarian grounds. He also argues that it does not exist in nature therefore the enlightenment revolution towards a simpler society should also be a revolution against slavery. 2) Slavery results in abuses against liberty and cruelty. 3) Even if someone willingly sacrifices their liberty for slavery, their children should not be tied to that same decision. The nature of slavery is such that individuality and liberty which are the cornerstones of the enlightenment cannot exist simultaneously. 4) The economic consequences of emancipation would not be terrible since slaves could be replaced by paid labourers. Letters Concerning the English Nation Voltaire -> considered English thought and institutions to be the best in human history and devoted himself to their introduction to France on his return - letter 13 speaks of the works of John Locke and the importance of the human soul - letter 14 compares the British philosopher Newton with the French philosopher Descartes - the main themes are religious tolerance, political moderation (approves of the English constitution), and experiential philosophy (Voltaire prefers Newton’s ideas on knowledge rather than Descartes observations which speculate far beyond the abilities of his sense) A Treatise of Human Nature David Hume -> he introduced his notion of skepticism which restricted human knowledge to the experience of ideas and impressions and denied the ability to verify their ultimate truth - all sciences are related to human nature including mathematics, natural philosophy, and natural religion - since they lie under the cognizance of man and are judged by their powers of observation - the sole end of logic is to explain the principles of our reasoning and the nature of our ideas - when experiments in all these fields are judiciously collected and compared, they results will be superior to any human observations 1) Hume believes that the disputes within the sciences are the fault of human observation and our limited understanding. 2) The science of man is the foundation for all fields of science and is how we observe and understand things. 3) When studying the science of man, one must understand human reason since how we analyze empirical evidence is relevant to the conclusions we draw. The Spirit of Laws Baron de Montesquieu -> explored the role of law in shaping political society and sought theoretical and practical responses to the problem of despotism -> he saw a political system where power was balanced as ideal (ie. the English system where power was split between the monarch and parliament) - it is the both the constitution and the fundamental laws of a nation which provide liberty to its people - the basis of political liberty is security - it is therefore on the goodness of criminal laws that the liberty of the subject principally depends - ie. a law which condemns a man to death on the testimony of a single witness is fatal to liberty - liberty is in perfection when criminal laws derive each punishment from the particular nature of the crime; decisions cannot be arbitrary - there are four types of crimes: ones prejudicial to religion, prejudicial to morals, prejudicial to public tranquility and finally crimes that are compromise the security of the subject - it is an abuse of the law to give a crime of treason to those individuals who don;t deserve it (ie. declaring people guilty based upon indiscreet speeches but no actions) 1) Montesquieu says that there are two types of liberty: political and philosophic. 2) Political liberty exists when we have security, philosophic liberty exists when one can exercise free will. 3) Liberty and reason are related since in order for the fundamental laws of a nation to allow political and philosophic liberty, it must follow logic and be responsive to the issues of the state based upon empirical evidence. 4) Nature is an important element when analyzing the types of crimes since the type of crime has a corresponding punishment. This simplifies the legal system and is reflective of the enlightenment. The Social Contract Jean-Jacques Rousseau -> sought to balance the freedom of the individual against the needs of the collective -> under his “social contract” people voluntarily relinquished certain rights and submitted to the general will -> these laws had absolute authority and would preserve equality between people - man is born free and this liberty is a sacred right resulting from the nature of man - the family unit is the first model of political societies: the ruler is the father and the people are the children. They are all born free and equal and only alienate their liberty only for their own advantage - no man has a natural authority over his fellow man - to renounce liberty is to renounce being a man - in man’s natural state, the human race would perish unless it changed its manner of existence - to solve this, each person puts all his power under the supreme direction of the general will - the passage from the state of nature to a civil state marks a change in man where justice is substituted for instinct - he deprives himself of some advantages which he got from nature; in return he gains mental stimulation and an uplifted soul - the general will is always right and tends to public advantage but it does not
More Less

Related notes for HIS109Y1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit