HST250H1 Chapter Notes - Chapter 11, 4, 14, 5, 18: Structured Interview, Consequentialism, Deontological Ethics
Document Summary
C h a p t e r 11: e t h i ca l is s ue s. Criteria for a sse ssing ethica l acceptability. T(cid:449)o (cid:449)a(cid:455)s of ide(cid:374)tif(cid:455)i(cid:374)g issues (cid:449)ith a (cid:396)esea(cid:396)(cid:272)h desig(cid:374) . The consequentialist view evaluates three main things: consequences for the subject, the academic field, and society. Looks at things based on costs and benefits, if the benefits outweigh the costs, then the research design is allowed to bend the rules a little bit. Focuses on the wellbeing of the subject and emphasizes debriefing so that they are not negatively impacted in the long run. The deontological view states that there are certain rules that we should simply never violate. In this case, the (cid:271)e(cid:374)efits a(cid:396)e(cid:374)"t e(cid:448)e(cid:374) (cid:272)o(cid:374)side(cid:396)ed; if there are any negatives, then the research should not proceed regardless of the benefits: deon: greek for obligation, duty.
