critically_evaluating_sources

3 Pages
59 Views

Department
Innis College Courses
Course Code
INI204Y1
Professor
Roger Riendeau

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 3 pages of the document.
Description
1 Critically Evaluating Sources and Writing a Critical Review The Nature of the Critical Review A review is an exercise in critical analytical reading (or observation) that generates a definite personal response. A review informs readers about the nature and significance of a particular book, film, or other work. But a review goes beyond summary to analyze and evaluate the work in an objective manner. A review judges the relative success or failure of a given work with specific references to the work and other research to support the judgement. Thus, a review describes what the work contains, analyzes how the work tried to achieve its purpose, and expresses the reviewer's reactions. In other words, reviewers answer not only the what? but also the so what? question about a work. Because of its brevity, the review can only focus on a few important ideas and aspects of the work or what the reviewer considers to be the most significant parts of the work. The reviewer must support with explanation and/or illustration all of the critical comments. The reviewer's stance is to be objective and critical, not impressionistic and merely negative. A critic is not someone who simply "criticizes," but a person who studies, analyzes, and then renders a rational judgment of what he/she has seen. Criticism involves identifying not only the problems with an author's work but also its valuable contributions and strengthens. A moderate tone will be very important to make a review appear reliable and intelligent. Preparing the Review The first and most important step in writing a critical review is a careful reading or observation of the work under study. The first reading or observation will provide the reviewer with a preliminary impression of the author's thesis and the basic structure of the argument presented in the work. The second reading or observation will enable the reviewer to analyze the work more thoroughly through a consideration of some of the following questions: • What is the author's thesis, hypothesis, or research question? • What is the author's purpose? • Who is the author's intended audience? • Who is the author (qualifications)? • What are the author's methods? • What are the most important arguments or research results that the author offers to support the thesis? • What evidence does the author present to support the arguments? • What are the author's underlying assumptions or biases? • What are the author's conclusions (and any implications that he or she discussed)? After several readings or observations of the work, the evaluation process can begin with a consideration of some of the following questions as appropriate: • Are the author's purpose and thesis clearly stated? • Is the text appropriate for the intended
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit