Textbook Notes (363,236)
Canada (158,278)
LIN204H1 (12)
Chapter 1

Lin204 Chapter 1 Exercise Answers

14 Pages
Unlock Document

University of Toronto St. George
Anne- St Amand

Answers to exercises: Chapter 1 1. Public opinions about English These statements illustrate widely held misconceptions about language and the English language, in particular. Here weve provided a brief discussion of each of them, together with some handy references that you might like to follow up. 1. English is the language of England. At the start of Chapter 11 we quote the words of Homer Simpson: English? Who needs that? I'm never going to England! As we describ e here, Homer is completely mistaken and not simply for the reason that English is the standard language of the USA. The worlds population is around six billion and a staggering proportion of this six billion are already regular users of English approximately one out of every five of the worlds population speaks English to some level of competence. This global takeover by English probably began more than 450 years ago with the initial spread towards Wales and Scotland. Since that time English has been slowly but surely bulldozing its way to becoming the language of the world and now even the language of space and cyberspace. The need for international intelligibility, coupled with a series of geographical, cultural, economic and political episodes, has secured the position of English as a global lingua franca or common language (well, at least for the moment speakers of English should not be complacent!). Worldwide opportunities involving trade, international travel, satellite broadcasting, the information superhighway, world press, world stock markets and multinational corporations are changing the concept of the English speech community beyond recognition. No longer are we simply looking at a group of people bound together because they live close by and speak the same language. English has now established itself in almost every corner of the globe, and as Crystal (2006: 412) put it, No one nation can any longer be said to own English and no one nations anxieties over local norms of usage will make much impact in a world where diverse regional standards are the norm, and where the Internet provides these varieties with new levels of public display. Recommended reading Svartvik, J. and Leech, G. 2006: English: one tongue, many voices. Houndvilles: Palgrave Macmillan. Crystal, D. 2006: Into the twenty-first century. In L. Mugglestone (ed.) The Oxford history of English (pp. 394414). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2. English is the hardest language to learn. In fact it is impossible to say which language is the hardest to learn. There are basically two reasons for this. One, it depends where you start from. If English is your mother tongue, then its going to be far harder to learn a language that isnt closely related or indeed linguistically related at all. An English speaker would find Irish or Welsh difficult, more difficult than Dutch and German. These languages are all relatives, to be sure, but Dutch and German are near relatives, being in the same Germanic family as English. Even harder to learn would be languages from a completely different language family, say one of the Australian Aboriginal languages, a Dravidian language like Tamil, or perhaps an Amerindian language like Nootka or Navaho. The sounds and grammar would be very different and the vocabulary unfamiliar, not just in form but also in content. But what also makes it hard to determine the relative difficulty of a language is that we are dealing with complexity at different levels. One example might involve, say, morphology. As you will see in this book, when it comes to grammatical morphology English is rather impoverished. An English noun like duck can have two forms only (duck/ducks) and verbs come in fours (quack/s/ed/ing). Modern Italian and Spanish verbs have about 50 different forms, Classical Greek verbs 350. There are some languages, such as many of the American Indian languages, that show far greater morphological complexity than even the Greek. Polysynthetic languages, as they are known, show mind-bogglingly long and complicated word forms, at least from the perspective of an English speaker. But then you have to take in other aspects of the language for example, sounds and sentence construction. There are also languages that might be described as difficult from the point of view of rules of politeness and indirect speech styles. So heres the rub it is impossible to say what language is the hardest to learn because there is no straightforward measure of simplicity. Typically what you find is complexity in one area of the language and simplicity in another. Recommended reading Trudgill, P. and Bauer, L. (eds) 1998: Myths about language. New York: Penguin. 3. Writing is a more perfect form of language than speech. Once upon a time we wrote as we spoke. Speech was primary and writing was there to represent it visually. Nowadays its the reverse. When reading and writing ceased to be educational luxuries but rather became necessities, writing took centre stage and speech started to be viewed more as its oral representation. Writing also took a hold of our minds in ways it hadnt done before (cf. Bolinger 1980: 51). So focused are we now on the written word that many of us dont even think words exist until we see how they are spelled somehow they dont become real until we can actually see them. Literate people also attribute sounds to the letters of these words we are expected to say our hs, we are expected not to drop our gs. This is nonsensical, of course, because letters dont have sounds; they symbolise sounds. But ours is very much a society where the linguistic tail wags the dog even what we now think of as the rules of English grammar are based largely on written texts. As Jim Miller once told us, when the Watergate Tapes were first transcribed and reproduced in the papers, the public was horrified how could they have elected people who are unable to produce a decent grammatical sentence? But this was spontaneous speech where, as you will see in this book, the concept of sentence is simply not appropriate. Until quite recently, even the activities of linguists and grammarians overwhelmingly concentrated on the structures of planned and highly standardized speech (and therefore usually written). Relatively little was known about the unplanned and more spontaneous discourse varieties. Recording is a modern phenomenon and we simply did not have proper access to live unsolicited speech. Unfortunately, the legacy of this is that people have come to equate normal language with the written form. This, together with the increasing importance of writing over speech in society, has meant that common spoken features remain highly stigmatized. The following is one such example: Melanie: Oh, theres someone came through yesterday. If this were a piece of written language, we would expect the clause Melanie utters to have a wh-word (who). But this is speech and what we must never do is judge it through the spectacles of writing. Speech is a very different beast it is not spoken writing any more than writing is speech written down. The two mediums have their own distinctive capabilities of expression, their own very different sets of rules. Recommended reading Bolinger, D. 1980: Language: the loaded weapon. Harlow: Longman. 4. The English language is going to the dogs. English has been changing throughout its lifetime and its still changing today. For most speakers, these changes are fine as long as theyre well and truly in the past. Paradoxically, people can be curious about word origins and the stories that lie behind the structures we find in our language, but they experience a queasy distaste for any change that might be happening under their noses. There are even language critics who are convinced that English is dying, or if not dying, at least being progressively crippled through long years of mistreatment. There is a special human kind of doublethink involved here. The fact that Shakespeare might have misinterpreted the word grovelling and backformed a new verb to grovel is interesting; the fact that younger speakers have done the same with versus and created a new verb to verse compete against (as in Team A is versing Team B) is calamitous. If dictionary makers and handbook writers do acknowledge
More Less

Related notes for LIN204H1

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.