Textbook Notes (368,040)
Canada (161,588)
Psychology (2,971)
PSY100H1 (1,821)
Chapter

CH2 – RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (textbook notes)

3 Pages
42 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSY100H1
Professor
Ashley Waggoner Denton
Semester
Fall

Description
CH2 – RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Scientific inquiry  SCIENTIFIC METHOD – a systematic procedure of observing and Types of Psychological Research measuring phenomena to answer questions (4 goals) about what  Common Characteristics of All Types happens, when it happen, what causes it, and why. o VARIABLE – something in the world that can be measured and that o More objective than causal observations can vary, also be manipulated by experimenter o Three essential elements: o Operational definitions – ID & quantify variables for measurement  THEORY – a model of interconnected ideas and concepts that  Constructs – internal attributes/characteristics that cannot be explains what is observed and makes predictions about future directly observed; but useful describing and explaining behavior events; good theory generate (multiple) testable hypothesis  DESCRIPTIVE STUDY (Observational study) – involve observing and  Falsifiability – must be possible, in principle, make classifying behavior observation show hypothesis/theory to be false o valued early in research process  see whether a phenomenon  HYPOTHESIS – A specific prediction of what should be observed exists, expand later w/ diff research in the world if a theory is correct; o Observer Intervention  RESEARCH – scientific process that involves the systematic and  NATURALISTIC OBSERVATION – a passive descriptive study in careful collection of data which observers do not change or alter ongoing behavior  DATA – objective observations or measurements  PARTICIPANT OBSERVATION – a type of descriptive study in  findings support theory or req. theory modified/rejected which the researcher is actively involved in the situation  human behaviors req. >1 theory  no single study  Problem: participants change behavior when observed provide definite answer  Req. observer keep objectivity, minimize impact on o Cyclic processes: new hypothesis  new research methods test  situation –ex experimenter join cult, study dooms day re-evaluates, refines theory  again o Developmental Designs  REPLICATION – repetition of an experiment to confirm the  LONGITUDINAL STUDIES – involve observing and classifying results; 2+ studies same conclusion, increase finding confidence developmental changes that occur in the same people over time o Serendipity – discover valuable unexpected findings  Advantages: provide information of age effects on the o [HOMER] Hypothesize  Operationalize  Measure  Evaluated  same people to see developmental changes Replicate/Revise/Report  Disadvantages: expensive, time consuming, may lose ppl  CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES – involve observing and classifying developmental changes that occur in different groups of people at the same time  Advantages: faster, less expensive  Disadvantages = unidentified variables may be involved (3 variable problem) o OBSERVER BIAS (issue) – systematic errors in observation that occur because of an observer’s expectations  cultural norms suggest inhibiting/expressing certain behaviors  subjective indicator observations affected  ex. Facial expressions, likely rate women more emotional  EXPERIMENTER EXPECTANCY EFFECT – actual change in the behavior of the people or animals being observed that is due to observer bias  ex. same rats raised w/ diff expectations = diff results; trainers’ beliefs unconsciously affected trainers’ behavior  Solution: use of blind experimenters  CORRELATIONAL STUDY – examines how variables are naturally related in the real world, w/o researcher/observer intervention to alter them o Advantage: reply on naturally occurring relationships  May take place in real world settings o Disadvantage: Doesn’t support causal relationships btwn variables  DIRECTIONALITY PROBLEM – correlational relationships btwn two variables, cannot determine which cause which  ex. Less sleep (A), More Stress (B); AB or BA  THIRD VARIABLE PROBLEM – the experimenter cannot directly manipulate the independent variable, therefore possibly an unmeasured variable actually influences the dependent variable  ex. Places w/ more churches, also higher crime rates; third variable = urban center/population  may use statistical procedures rule out potential 3 variables and directionality problem  more confidence in findings o Ethics reason force some research question to correlational studies  Involve unethical factors (trauma) can’t induce/control  EXPERIMENTAL STUDY (Experiment) – a study that tests casual hypotheses by measuring and manipulating variables, seeing effects o Advantage: can determine causal relationships btwn 2 variables o Disadvantage: often takes place in an artificial setting  Sampling processes o CONTROL GROUP (Comparison group) – participants receive no o POPULATION – the entire group the experimenter is interested in intervention or an intervention different from the one being studied  SAMPLE – a subset of a population who are studied o EXPERIMENTAL GROUP (Treatment group) – the participants in a o Sampling – process people from population selected for the sample study that receive the desired intervention  Sample should represent the population o INDEPENDENT VARIABLE (IV) – the condition that is manipulated by  Random sampling – each population member equal chance the experimenter to examine its impact on the dependent variable being chosen to participate o DEPENDENT VARIABLE (DV) – the measure that is affected by  Convenience sample – ppl conveniently available for the study manipulation of the independent variable o SELECTION BIAS – when participants in different groups in an o Establishing causality experiment differ systematically in unexpected ways  CONFOUND – anything that affects a dependent variable and o RANDOM ASSIGNMENT – each research participant has an equal may unintentionally vary between the experimental conditions chance of being assigned to any level of the independent variable of a study, allows alternative explanations for observed data  Diff. btwn groups tends average out when assignment random  Req. makes sure only variances = IV; need rigorous control,  On average groups are equivalent minimize possibility of confounds, alternative explanations  META-ANALYSIS – A “study of studies” that combines the findings of multiple studies addressing same issue to arrive at a conclusion o Weigh heavier studies w/ larger samples o Examine effect size: large-medium-small-no differences o Replication concept built into meta-analysis Methods of Data Collection in Psychological Research  Levels of analysis o Disadvantages: subjective: If a researcher has a causal theory, this o Biological – measure brain process, hormone levels theory can bias what is observed and recorded  Ex. whether men secrete more testosterone when X
More Less

Related notes for PSY100H1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit