Textbook Notes (368,559)
Canada (161,962)
Psychology (2,981)
PSY100H1 (1,831)
Chapter

Memory and Cognition - ch1.docx

6 Pages
44 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSY100H1
Professor
Pare, Dwayne
Semester
Winter

Description
Memory and Cognition Chapter 1 – The Science of the Mind - Everything that we do, everything that we feel or say, depends on our cognition – what we know, what we remember and how we think The Scope of Cognitive Psychology - Cognitive psychology was known as the scientific study of knowledge o This led to questions like how is knowledge acquired, retained and used for making decisions and problem soving - Ex. Your studying for a test and the information wont “stick” in your mind, you look for another strategy to study - Ex. Your friends movement in the room is acting as a distraction and you cant shut it out - Ex. You learn that a certain number of people decided to vote for candidate X – how did they decide whom to vote for? o In each of these examples things aren’t going as you wish : you remember less then you want to, you are unable to ignore distraction and voters are making a choice you don’t like - Make it seem like cognitive psychology is focused on our ability to remember, or to pay attention, or to think though options when making a choice - Cognitive psychology is broader – our range of actions, thoughts and feelings depend on our knowledge - Many and perhaps all of our encounters with the world depend on supplementing your experience with knowledge that you bring to the situation ex. The piggy bank example from lecture - Amnesia – case where someone, because of brain damage, has lost the ability to remember certain materials o Ex. HM – memory loss was a byproduct of brain surgery o Had no trouble remembering events prior to the surgery, but he seemed unable to recall any event that occurred after the operation o His uncle died after his surgery – and each time he asked about him he would be told the news, would experience greif and shock but then soon forget because of his memory loss o Without memory he had no way of coming to terms with his uncles death o Commented on the fact that he didn’t know who he was – without memory we don’t know if we are deserving of praise for good deeds or blame, whether we kept promises or achieved our goals o Without memory there is no sense of self - Our self-concept depends on our knowledge – our emotional adjustments to the world, rely on our memories - Our ability to understand a story, a conversation or experiences depend on supplementing the experience with our knowledge A Brief History - Is roughly 50 years old - The cognitive revolution – took place between the 1950’s and 1960’s – represented a striking change in style of research used by most psychologist - Changed the intellectual map of our field The Years of Introspection - Wundt and Titchener – launched a new enterprise of research psychology - There is no way for you to experience my thoughts or I yours - The only person who can experience or observe you’re your thoughts is you - The only way to study thoughts is for each of us to introspect or “look within” to observe and record the content of our own mental lives and experiences - They could not be casual, had to be trained – were given a vocab to describe and to report experiences with minimum interpretation - Some thoughts are unconscious and introspection was limited as a research tool - Ex. If you were asked whats your number, it probably popped up into your thoughts without any effort – therefore a lot of cognitive processes take place out of our awareness - Another problem – there must be some way to test claims so that we an separate correct assertions from false ones - Ex. I insist that my headaches are worse then yours o You describe then in extreme terms – but this may just reflect your verbal style and not your headaches o The only information about headaches is what comes to us through filter of my description and we have no way of knowing whether that filter is coloring the evidence - In science we need objective observations – ones that are not dependant on a particular point of view or a descriptive style - Want to make sure the raw data is out in plain view so I can inspect your evidence and you can inspect mine – can make sure neither of is exaggerating the facts – cant be done with introspection The Years of Behaviourism - Behaviors are obviously observable in the right way o Data concerned with behavior or objective data and are measurable, recordable, and physical events - You can record the pattern of data and also the behaviors I produce each day – can see how the pattern of behavior changes with the passage of time and experiences  learning history - Beliefs, wishes, goals, expectations – cannot be directly observed, cannot be recorded - Behaviorist movement – uncovered a range of principles concerned with behavior changes in response to stimuli - Found that a great deal of behavior could not explained in these terms – the way people act and the ways that they feel are guided by how they understand or interpret situations and not by the situation itself o Leads to us misunderstanding why people are doing what they’re doing and will make the wrong predictions about how they’ll behave in the future o Subjective entities ie. Beliefs, feelings .. must be considered if we want to understand behavior - If we want to predict responses, we need to refer to the stimulus and also to the person’s knowledge and understanding of, and contribution to, this stimulus - Ex. A friend produces a physical stimulus “Pass the salt, please” and you produce a salt-passing behaviour o This behavior could be evoked by other stimuli like: “Could, I have the salt”, “Salt, please” o What do these stimuli have in comman? o Similar sounds would not lead to the salt-passing behavior ex. “Salt the pass” or “Sass the palt” o Stimuli that are different from one another produce the same effect – is not plainly what unites the various stimuli that evoke salt passing o They all however mean the same thing – to predict the behavior if in the dining hall, we need to ask what these stimuli mean to you o Indicates the impossibility of a complete behaviorist psychology The Roots of Cognitive Psychology - How people act is shaped by how they perceive the situation, how they understand the stimuli, and so on - The only direct means of studying the mental world is introspection and introspection is unworkable – we need to study the mental world but we cant - Transcendental method – you begin with the observable facts and then work backward from these observations – how did these observations come about and what causes led to these effects o Called “inference to best explanation” o Ex. Physicist study electrons but have never seen one, they are not observable but their presence has led to visible effects o Physicist observe the clues that electrons leave behind, and from this information they form hypotheses about what exactly electrons like in order to produce the same effects o Can arrange for experiments with new measures and maximize the likelihood that the electron will leave useful clues behind o The prospect of reproducing ecperiments and varying the experiments to test the hypothesis – is what gives science its power o
More Less

Related notes for PSY100H1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit