Textbook Notes (368,875)
Canada (162,227)
Psychology (2,981)
PSY100H1 (1,831)
M.Fournier (26)
Chapter 8

Chapter 8.docx

7 Pages
53 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSY100H1
Professor
M.Fournier
Semester
Winter

Description
Chapter 8 Social-cognitive approaches to personality – human beings are complex information-processing systems that operate in social environments The Psychology of Personal Constructs George Kelly’s Theory (Page 304!! COROLLARY) A person is motivated to predict or anticipate what will happen to him or her Each of us classifies our world by developing personal constructs – characteristic ways of how things are alike and diff from one another (more like hypotheses to be tested than like assumed facts)  Every construct is bipolar (dichotomy corollary)  People best understood in their own construct systems  Each person develops their own construct system that contains a number of constructs organized into a hierarchy (organizational corollary)  Every person’s construct system is unique (individuality corollary)  To know another person’s construct system is to see the world through their eyes (sociality corollary)  W/in a person’s construct system, particular constructs differ from one another w/ respect to the range of convenience – the extent to which a given personal constructs is likely to guide a person’s interpretation of events and the behaviour he or she is likely to show (range corollary)  Some constructs are highly permeable and others aren’t (modulation corollary) o Person with an especially permeable construct system is likely to be seen by others as very-opened minded o Complete permeable isn’t good, doesn’t function well  When a person’s constructs are mutually incompatible and contradictory, then they are more likely to have a difficult time making consistent sense of the world and anticipating events in an adaptive way (fragmentation corollary) Kelly views anxiety as the recognition that the events w/ which one is confronted lie outside the range of convenience of one’s construct system Core role structure – the construction a person has of who they are in relation to significant people, such as parents. Guilt is the perception that one is no longer living according to one’s personal-construct system Exploring Personal Constructs: The Rep Test Role Construct Repertory Test (Rep Test) – designed to explore personal constructs in people’s lives  One version asks you to make a series of comparisons among those who play important roles in your life o Compile a Role Title list, similar and contrast o Each of the parings represents a single construct o People who use many different kinds of constructs are said to manifest higher levels of cognitive complexity and tend to view the world in high differentiated manner o People who use few different kinds of constructs are viewed has having a simpler, more global construct system Cognitive Styles and Personality Cognitive styles – people’s characteristics and typically preferred modes of processing information  Partly captures in Openness to Experience (O), people high in O tent to process info in a more nuanced, differentiated, and abstract matter while those low in O see fewer distinctions and adhere to concrete and clearly defined categories Field Independence – Dependence A general dimension of cognitive style ranging from highly analytical and differentiated processing of information (field-independence) to highly contextual and global processing (field-dependence) Tilted chair/room Witkin  Field-dependent o People who use room as the reference for their adjustment. o Perception and judgment of perpendicularity depend on the “field,” or environment  Field-independent o People who bypass the field and make their perception and judgment according to inner cues Dimension has two poles  Highly field-independent people o Process info in an especially analytical and differentiated style o They rely on internal frames of reference that enable them to act upon info in a highly independent fashion  Highly field-dependent people employ external frames of reference available in the field  Base their perceptions on the external context w/in which they occurs Embedded Figures Test – person attempts to find forms hidden in an embedding field Field-independence  Associated w/ greater levels of perceptual and cognitive restructuring  Tend to reshape info from the environment according to internalized plans, rules, and goals  View info in the nonsocial world in a highly differentiated manner  Predicts the ability to block our irrelevant info and focus attention on central tasks and stimuli in complex learning situations  Cops of high FI make more accurate judgments under high-stimulation crime conditions  Drawn to careers that require cognitive restructuring and objective analysis of info, such as careers in science, math, management, mechanics  Men score toward FI Field-dependence  More global and intuitive in processing info about the world  Tend to engage in less cognitive restructuring, accepting info from the environment in its own contextual terms, rather than employing internal plans and guidelines for info  Tend to be more interested in humanitarian and social-welfare professions, such as careers in the ministry, social work, teaching young children, social sciences, selling and advertising  More senitive to social context  Pay closer attention to interpersonal cues ans social info  Spend more time lookint at people than inanimate objects and make more eye contact when talking w/ others  Prefer being physically closer to others  Women score toward FD Integrative Complexity Integrative complexity – the extent to which a person reasons about issues in a differentiated and integrative manner  Assessed through written material People high in IC  Make many conceptual distinctions and see many interconnections when interpreting and making sense of intellectual and social issues People low in IC  See fewer distinctions and tend to reason about the world in a holistic manner Examples of politics, war, illness, slavery Social-Cognitive Theory and the Person Social Intelligence Nancy Cantor and John Kihlstorm argue that the key to understanding personality coherence is social intelligence – each person’s set of skills, abilities, and knowledge about social situations According to them social interaction involves problem solving Consists of three different kinds of organized knowledge: concepts, episodes, and rules. Concepts and episodes may be grouped together as aspects of declarative knowledge Concepts are the
More Less

Related notes for PSY100H1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit