Textbook Notes (369,050)
Canada (162,363)
Psychology (2,981)
PSY100H1 (1,831)
M.Fournier (26)
Chapter 18

Chapter 18.doc

4 Pages
60 Views

Department
Psychology
Course Code
PSY100H1
Professor
M.Fournier

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 4 pages of the document.
Description
Chapter 18 • Fitness to stand trial: accused individuals must have a rational understanding of the charges against them and the proceedings of the trial, understand the consequences of the proceedings and be able to communicate with their lawyers; definition from Criminal Code; aims to protect fairness of legal process and presser accused individual’s autonomy; stems from common law requirement that defendant conduct proper defence o Problems: 40% of those examined in Vancouver study showed impairments on fitness to stand trial interview (without disorder); IQ scores one of strongest predictors related to legal abilities; include assessment of mental disorder (as defined by law) and impairments in legal abilities; mental disorder not sufficient on its own o Trial: most common type of pre-trial evaluation; trials postponed if there is reason to believe individual will become fit in foreseeable future and can be forced to receive treatment o Diagnosis: defendants with long histories of psychiatric problems are more likely to be referred; those with psychiatric disorders show most impairment; Canadian forensic psychologists leaders in developing tests of cognitive abilities; disorganization symptoms and hallucinations more troublesome than delusions  Fitness Interview Test: Ronald Roesch; 30-45 minute clinical interview to develop fitness to stand trial; • Insanity: legal term; people can’t be held responsible for their acts if they were so mentally incapacitated they could not conform to societal rules; don’t need to be chronically insane, only insane at the time • Insanity defence: used in case of John Hinckley (shot Reagan and his press secretary); renamed not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder defence in Canada after 1992; case of Andre Dallaire who attempted to assassinate Chretien (paranoid schizophrenia  institutionalization, outpatient care in community); fewer than 1 in 100 defendants file insanity plea in US and only 26% of these result in acquittal; usually men between 20-29 who are unmarried, unemployed, have a history of violent offences, has been diagnosed with disorder • Battered women syndrome: Loreena and John Bobbitt; temporary insanity for women who injure or kill abusive partners; women’s sense of helplessness and reasonable apprehension that her life is in danger following pattern of chronic assault; Jane Hurshman killed abusive common law partner and was acquitted • Consequences: 85% of those acquitted are sent to mental hospitals; all but 1% put under some type of supervision and care; normally detained longer in hospitals than they would have been in prison; indefinite detainment has been ruled unconstitutional; little consistency across provinces with respect to amount of time someone is detained • M’Naghten rule: person must have mens rea (guilty mind) or intention to commit guilty act in order to be held responsible for the act; mental defect precludes someone from knowing nature and quality of act or not knowing act is wrong o Problems: have to determine what is meant by “disease of the mind”; law unclear and inconsistent and only psychoses frequently recognized; difficult to make retrospective judgment as to whether person did not know right from wrong at time crime was committed; disorders do not prevent someone from knowing right from wrong (example of Dahmer) • Criticisms of insanity defence: mental health professionals often disagree about the nature and causes of psychological disorders and evaluation of defendants’ states of mind at time crimes were committed; lawyers on each side find professionals who agree with their view; variability in actual expertise of psychiatrists; frequently present data and test results not connected to context of occurrence; don’t when someone should be held responsible for their behaviours • Freedom of choice: can we force people into mental institutions and to undergo treatment; historically, state’s legal authority to detain individuals within Canadian insane asylums was absolute • Violet Bowyer: 1930 insanity hearing in Ontario; convicted of vagrancy and committed to term of two years less a day; maximum sentence; after jail time, she was referred to two medical practitioners who determined her insane and ordered her to Ontario Hospital for the Insane in Cobourg; judge determined burden proof was on person demonstrating sanity; misuse of civil commitment proceedings • Civil commitment: state viewed as “parent” of those who can’t care for themselves; provincial guidelines for when someone can be hospitalized against their will; personal freedom suspended in securing involuntary detention in
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit