Textbook Notes (367,844)
Canada (161,454)
Psychology (2,971)
PSY220H1 (200)
Chapter 7

PSY 220 CH.7 summary.docx

6 Pages
Unlock Document

Dan Dolderman

PSY 220 CH.7 Attitudes, Behaviour, and Rationalization • Lyndon Johnson, U.S. president during the Vietnam War found an interesting way of dealing with those in his administration who had begun to privately express doubts. He sent them with reporters to Vietnam on a fact finding mission. The people would then have to answer and defend the war to the reporters. They would not risk publicly acknowledging their doubts, and would prefer to try to influence the administration policy from within. This would make it so that they would have to defend the war, and since people often cannot have contradicting views held by themselves, this tactic served to decrease the doubts of those people. • Attitudes can influence behaviour and behaviour can influence attitudes. Evidence now showing that influence of attitudes on behaviour is weaker. The Three Components of Attitudes • Attitude: An evaluation of an object in a positive or negative fashion that includes the 3 elements of affect, cognition, and behaviour. • Affect – how much people like or dislike an object. Cognitions – thoughts that typically reinforce a person’s feelings (knowledge or beliefs about the object). Behaviours – approach versus avoid. MeasuringAttitudes • Likert scale: A numeric scale used to assess people’s attitudes; it includes a set of possible answers with labeled anchors on each extreme. • Surveys most widely used method for measuring attitudes. • Traditional Likert scales sometimes fail to differentiate people with stringer and weaker attitudes. • One other approach is to measure accessibility of an attitude. • Response latency: The time it takes an individual to respond to a stimulus, such as an attitude question. • Asecond way to assess the strength and importance of a person’s attitude is to determine the centrality of the attitude to the individual’s belief system. If a belief is important to you, it should be highly co-ordinated with attitudes to other similar issues. • Implicit attitude measures: Indirect measures of attitudes that do not involve self-report. • Implicit measures look at automatic attitudes. Predicting Behaviour From Attitudes • LaPiere travelled in the States with a Chinese couple in the 1930’s when people were not accepting. The group were only denied service at 1/250 establishments that they visited. LaPiere wrote to all the establishments asking if they accepted Orientals, 90% said they did not. Suggested that attitudes do not influence behaviour as much. Attitudes Sometimes Conflict with Other Powerful Determinants of Behaviour • Attitudes compete with other determinants to determine behaviour, and attitudes do not always win out. Attitudes Are Sometimes Inconsistent • Attitudes may conflict with one another. • The different components of attitudes may not always align (how we feel about a person and what we think of him). Introspecting about the Reasons for OurAttitudes. • It is often hard to pin down the true reason for an attitude. Thinking about it can lead to confusion as to what our true feelings are. Attitudes Are Sometimes Based on Second-hand Information • Attitudes based on direct experience better predict subsequent behaviour than those derived indirectly. • Attitudes about participation in psychological research predict actual participation much more strongly among those who have previously taken part in psychological research than among those who have not. The Mismatch between GeneralAttitudes and Specific Targets • Consistency between attitudes and behaviour is higher when the attitudes and behaviour are at the same level of specificity. • What most people usually think of as attitudes toward different classes of people, places, things, and events are often expressions of attitudes towards a prototype of a given category. “Automatic” Behaviour That Bypasses Conscious Attitudes • Often behaviour is more reflexive than reflective, and the surrounding context elicits behaviour automatically. Predicting Attitudes From Behaviour • Over time, mere outward behaviour can give way to genuine inner conviction. Balance Theory • Balance theory: A theory holding that people try to maintain balance among their beliefs, cognitions, and sentiments. Cognitive Dissonance Theory • Cognitive dissonance theory: A theory that maintains that inconsistencies among a person’s thoughts, sentiments, and actions create an aversive emotional state (dissonance) that leads to efforts to restore consistency. Decisions and Dissonance • All hard decisions arouse some dissonance. • Move to LAfor good weather, you will likely enjoy the sun, but may detest the bad air and traffic. Once you have already moved, you will try to negate these negatives to ensure there is no dissonance. Example: The air is simply hazy and I have learned so much from those audio-books I listen to on my long commutes. • Interview betters in line before and after placing bets on horses. Those who had yet to place bets rated their horse as having fair odds. Those who rated after they had placed their bets rated them at good. One person even approached researchers after placing the bet to have them change his answer from fair to good, wait no, excellent. (Knox and Inkster) • Making hard decisions triggers dissonance reductions to be made. They undervalue the bad aspects of their choice and the good aspects of the thing that they didn’t choose. • Aspects can be distorted before making a decision as well. We can distort information to support our initial preference. Effort Justification • Effort justification: People’s tendency to reduce dissonance by justifying the time, effort, or money they have devoted to something that has turned out to be unpleasant or disappointing. • ‘Sweet lemons rationalization’is arguing that something isn’t really that bad. • Participants went to a group to discuss sex. Split in 2. One read out mildly embarrassing sex related words, the other read out highly embarrassing sex related words. They were told that they all passed and could continue to the next aspect of the study. They sat in on a boring discussion. People who had to suffer through the highly embarrassing scenario rated the boring discussion as higher because they had to get through more to get there. (Aaronson & Mills) Induced Compliance and Attitude Change • Induced (forced) compliance: Subtly compelling individuals to behave in a manner that is inconsistent with their beliefs, attitudes, or values, in order to elicit dissonance – and therefore a change in their original attitudes or values. • This was the reason behind the president’s actions described earlier. • Leon Festinger and Merrill Carlsmith study. Participants doing boring tasks (turning pegs, flipping stuff) for an hour.Asked to rate how much they enjoyed the experiment. Control rated low. Told participants that they normally got a confederate to pose as a participant to tell the people beforehand that the study was interesting, but they were nowhere to be found. Offered 1 group 1$ and the other 20$ to tell the next participants that it was interesting. Led to dis
More Less

Related notes for PSY220H1

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.