Textbook Notes (369,074)
Canada (162,369)
Psychology (2,981)
PSY260H1 (42)
Chapter 4

PSY260ch4textbooknotes.docx

4 Pages
88 Views

Department
Psychology
Course Code
PSY260H1
Professor
Mandy Wintink

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 4 pages of the document.
Description
[PSY 260] TBK: Chapter 4 (Classical Conditioning) 1 4.2 B RAIN S UBSTRATES 1.1 MAMMALIAN CONDITIONING OFMOTOR R EFLEXES - Thompson realized that by removing / lesioning the cerebellum, rabbits no longer showed classical condition of new and old learning Adapted from the diagram in Gluck, Mercado + Myers textbook - 2 places where both CS & US converge o Purkinje cells o Interpositus Nucleus 1.2 E LECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL RECORDING IN THE C EREBELLUM - Interpositus nucleus firing matches eyeblink behaviour o Presence of eyeblink = neuron firing - Purkinje cells are always firing (at random) but well-trained animals have periods where they aren’t firing o Corresponds with AIRPUFF US o Because Purkinje INHIBIT interpositus nucleus 1.3 B RAIN S TIMULATION AS A S UBSTITUTE FOR BEHAVIOURAL TRAINING . - If you stimulate the inferior olive (associated with airpuff US) paired with pontine nuclei (specific to a tone CS) o You can actually elicit classical conditioning behaviour where the UR/ CR (eyeblink) is exactly like a trained rabbit. 1.4 I MPAIRED C ONDITIONING FOLLOWING C EREBELLAR DAMAGE - Interpositus: formation & executing response o You remove it, you remove all classical conditioning ability - Cerebellar cortex: response timing o Severely impairs but does not eliminate eyeblink conditioning  Usually just poorly timed o If the deep nuclei is spared then there can be some conditioning - Lateralization o Left cerebellum  left eye (eyeblink conditioning) - Patients: genetic degeneration of: o Deep nuclei: cannot acquire CRs o Purkinje cells: mixed results 1.5 E RROR CORRECTION THROUGH INHIBITORY FEEDBACK - Once trained: CR @ interpositus nucleus  inhibits  inferior olive from sending US info to the Purkinje cells. o Activity in inferior olive = actual US minus (due to IN inhibition) – expected US  Expected US = interpositus activity that control CR output  Like in the Rescorla-Wagner model o INFERIOR OLIVE = prediction error  Activity should diminish in each successive trial - Experiment: o Trained rabbits: eyeblink responses to tone CS o Injected drug into interpositus to BLOCK inhibitory connection bn interpositus + inferior olive o Therefore
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit