Textbook Notes (367,776)
Canada (161,389)
RSM225H1 (13)
Dan Shear (7)
Chapter

Ch 8-11 Contracts - Formation Incapacity Mistake.docx

20 Pages
96 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Rotman Commerce
Course
RSM225H1
Professor
Dan Shear
Semester
Fall

Description
CH. 8: CONTRACTS: FORMATION (OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE) Contract Elements - Overview: Contract Requirements (all 4 must be met): “O + A + C + I” Offer: one party (“offeror”) must offer (verbally, in writing, or by conduct) to make a contract (“c”) and specify all key terms + Acceptance: other party (“offeree”) must accept that offer, on those terms, without any changes + Consideration: the (accepted) offer must require each party to give something “in return for” what the other party must give (some exceptions – see Ch. 9 Contracts: Formation (Consideration and Intention)) + Intention: outward conduct of each party must show serious intention to make c Contract Elements - Offer: (1) Terms of Offer: offer must include (or refer to, or provide formula for determining) all key terms to be valid  exception: price: if price not addressed in offer:  if past practice for setting price, law assumes parties will follow that practice  “quantum meruit” (see also Ch. 9 Contracts: Formation (Consideration and Intention)) – must pay “reasonable” price  offer terms must be clear and unambiguous (or offer not valid)  Daniel R. Shear 2000 – 2012 All rights reserved. 1 (2) Offer vs. “Invitation to Make Offer”:  a party may make an offer, or invite the other party to make an offer  the law treats some situations as only an invitation only:  goods on store shelves, racks  goods shown in catalogues  advertisements (where ad refers to type of item(s) being sold but does not indicate which specific one(s) are being sold)  “invitation” does not satisfy “offer” element – “accepting” invitation = making offer (3) “Ticket Cases”:  involve “take it or leave it” standard form offers presented in written document (e.g. “ticket” or “receipt”), or posted on notice(s), or both  offers typically accepted by conduct (e.g. paying for ticket, parking car in lot, etc.)  nothing signed, no negotiation  law imposes a “reasonable notice” requirement:  only bound by those terms in offer for which reasonable notice given at time contract made  the more unreasonable or unexpected the term, the more clearly the notice must be to qualify as “reasonable notice” (4) Signing Contract:  creates strong presumption: read, understood and accepted all terms  some exceptions - see below under “Contract Elements - Acceptance” (5) When an Offer Ends: offer “lapses” (expires): (i) at the time (if any) specified in the offer  Daniel R. Shear 2000 – 2012 All rights reserved. 2 (ii) after a “reasonable time” (if no specific time mentioned)  consider: subject matter of offer, typical “turnover” for that type of subject matter, circumstances under which offer made (iii) upon either party dying or becoming insane offer is revoked (withdrawn): (i) if offeror communicates revocation (either directly to offeree, or indirectly through someone else)  communication must actually be received by offeree  revocation by mail only effective when actually received by offeree  unclear whether faxed revocation “actually received” when arrives in fax machine, or when viewed by offeree (ii) if it becomes unreasonable for offeree to believe offer still open offer is rejected (or offeree makes counter-offer) (6) Promise to Keep Offer Open:  not binding unless offeror receives “consideration” in return for this promise  i.e. must make separate contract (offeror promises to keep offer open for specified time, in return for consideration from offeree) – called “option” or “option agreement”  in effect there could be two contracts: (1) option agreement, and (2) contract that would result if original offer in question is ultimately accepted  Daniel R. Shear 2000 – 2012 All rights reserved. 3 (7) Counter-offer:  if “accept” offer but not exactly on terms offered, no acceptance – it is “counter-offer”  counter-offer rejects and cancels original offer (no longer able to accept original offer)  vs. “mere inquiry” – asking whether offered terms represent the “best” offer is not treated as counter-offer Contract Elements - Acceptance: (1) Terms of Acceptance: must be unqualified - cannot alter, add to or take away from any of the terms offered (2) Method of Acceptance:  “unilateral” contracts – where offer invites acceptance simply by doing what offer requires, acceptance involves doing what offer requires (e.g. offering reward)  “bilateral” contracts – where offer requires acceptance by promising to do something, acceptance involves communicating that promise to offeror before offer lapses or is revoked  general rule: may be communicated verbally, in writing, or by conduct  if offer specifies way acceptance must be communicated, must follow that way (3) Silence:  general rule: not acceptance  exceptions:  Daniel R. Shear 2000 – 2012 All rights reserved. 4  previous series of dealings between parties where silence considered acceptance  normal industry trade practice followed by both parties  parties agree in advance that silence means acceptance (4) Acceptance vs. Counter-offer vs. Mere Inquiry:  see above under “Contract Elements - Offer” (5) Signing Contract:  creates strong presumption – read, understood and accepted all terms  exceptions:  “non est factum” (“it is not my doing”) – e.g. illiterate or blind or do not understand language in which contract written  misrepresentation by omission (Tilden case - see Ch. 12 Contracts: Misrepresentation, Undue Influence, Duress) (6) “Mail Rule”:  applies where offeror does not specify required or preferred means of acceptance and reasonable for offeror to anticipate that acceptance might be by mail  general rule: acceptance effective when properly stamped and addressed acceptance letter is mailed (even if letter never received)  if offer states required method for acceptance (and that method is not mail), or prohibits acceptance by mail, no acceptance if mailed  if offeror states “preference” for acceptance by some means other than mail, but does not prohibit acceptance by mail, mailed acceptance not effective until offeror actually receives it  faxes and e-mails:  Daniel R. Shear 2000 – 2012 All rights reserved. 5  not clear whether “mail rule” would be extended to cover faxes and e-mails  Daniel R. Shear 2000 – 2012 All rights reserved. 6 CH. 9: CONTRACTS: FORMATION (CONSIDERATION AND INTENTION) Contract Elements - Consideration: (1) Meaning:  what a party is to give in return for what other party is to give  “give” can be to the other party or to a 3 party, and includes “give up” (2) Gratuitous Promise:  involves promise to give something when other party not required to give anything in return  generallynotenforceable(butsee“ExceptionstoConsideration”below) (3) Adequacy of Consideration:  “consideration” requires each party to give something – but does not require the things given to be of equivalent value (4) Settlement:  agree not to sue (or to stop lawsuit) in return for something (e.g. payment)  involves one party giving a “release” (giving up right to sue other party for something) in return for the other party giving something (e.g. $$)  release normally meets consideration requirement (unless each party knows lawsuit would not have succeeded – because then not really giving up anything by giving release) (5) Past Consideration:  involvessomethingalreadygiven(oralreadyrequiredtobegiven)byXtoY  Daniel R. Shear 2000 – 2012 All rights reserved. 7  cannot subsequently be used as new consideration from X in return for something new that Y is required to give in return (6) Existing Legal Duty:  involves situation where:  you already have a legal obligation to someone (e.g. Jay Doe) o e.g. have contract with Jay to sell Jay your used textbook for $10  and then you promise Jay that you will perform that same obligation (sell Jay your used textbook) in return for something new Jay will do (e.g. pay you additional $15 for that textbook)  you are not giving Jay any new consideration in return for Jay’s promise to pay more  so Jay’s promise to pay more is a gratuitous promise  BUT if you promise someone else (e.g. Z) that you will perform that obligation (sell Jay your used textbook), you are giving new consideration to Z  you are making a legal commitment to Z that you have not already made to Z (because you had only previously made that commitment to Jay) Exceptions to Consideration: (1) Promise Under Seal:  promise made in writing and signed under seal  “signed under seal” means signing and putting a seal (or writing “seal”) beside signature  promise is binding even if no consideration given in return for that promise (2) Injurious Reliance:  Daniel R. Shear 2000 – 2012 All rights reserved. 8  can apply to any promise  4 requirements: (1) (gratuitous) promise to give something + (2) reasonable to expect other party to rely on promise and change their conduct as a result + (3) other party does rely on promise and changes their conduct as a result + (4) “injustice” would result if promise not binding  note: currently mainly U.S. concept, but gaining some recognition in Canadian courts (3) Promissory Estoppel:  can only apply to promise to alter existing contract between the parties  4 requirements: (1) existing contract between X and Y + (2) X gives promise (express or implied) to alter contract for benefit of Y and X can expect Y to rely upon that promise + (3) Y relies on that promise + changes his/her conduct as a result + (4)Y would sufferreal hardship (as a result of relianceonX’s promise) if promise not binding  until recently could only be used as “shield” (i.e. if X sued Y based on original contract, Y could rely on X’s promise to alter contract)  but now may be possible to use as “sword” too (i.e. Y suing X to enforce X’s promise) Quantum Meruit:  general rule: offer must contain or refer to all key terms of proposed contract, or not valid  “quantum meruit” exception applies where reasonable for parties to expect that person ordering/requesting goods or services would pay something for them  Daniel R. Shear 2000 – 2012 All rights reserved. 9  states that where parties never discussed or agreed upon price, “reasonable” price applies (i.e. fair market value in that market or geographic area) Contract Elements - Intention:  must be reasonable to assume from outward conduct of parties that they had serious intention to make legal contract All rights reserved.00 – 2012 10 CH. 10: CONTRACTS: INCAPACITY, ILLEGALITY, NON-COMPETITION Legal Incapacity: (1) “Minors” Defined:  persons under the “age of majority”: 18 in Ontario (19 in B.C.) – at time contract made  law considers this a form of legal “incapac
More Less

Related notes for RSM225H1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit