Textbook Notes (369,141)
Canada (162,412)
Sociology (1,513)
SOC101Y1 (470)
Chapter 1

Nash, K. (2010). Chapter 1: Changing Definitions of Politics and Power – 1.2. The Weberian Tradition and 1.3. The Durkhemian Tradition. In Contemporary Political Sociology: Globalization, Politics and Power.

5 Pages
145 Views

Department
Sociology
Course Code
SOC101Y1
Professor
Jasmin Hristov

This preview shows pages 1 and half of page 2. Sign up to view the full 5 pages of the document.
Description
1.2 The Weberian Tradition of Political Sociology Weber • Autonomy of the political at state-level and liberal democracy are central • His definition of power and politics are very broad, the latter being “comprising any kind of independent leadership in action” – but he narrowed his field to the power and politics of the nation-state • State: has gained the legitimate monopoly of force ∴ most powerful institution which competes with influencing/sharing distribution of power inter-state or intra-state – but territoriality crucial∴ modern states viewed in competitive relation to other states (rather than in relation internal forces) nation-state is object of analysis • For Weber, concentration of the means of production (Marx) was important, but also the concentration of the means of administration o I.e. Modern states gain power by concentrating means of admin. In the hands of a few (oligarchy) o They create a bureaucracy with very limited/controlled power • Positives and Negatives of Bureaucracy: o Negative: Officials within the bureaucracy of admin. Have little say outside fulfilling their positions o Positive: in this modern, complex political and economical society, rationality provided by bureaucracy promises predictability, which is necessary for profitability o Positive: limited bureaucracy better then socialism – because under socialism, everything belongs to the state ∴ increasing its power and there would be counter power, such as the market, to manage the bureaucrats • Pros and Cons of Electoral/Representative Government o Empirical View (Negative): representative democracies cannot be practiced in large-scale, complex societies  Large societies cannot be directly accountable to the masses as it would lead to inefficiency and unpredictability o Empirical View (Negative): irrationality and ignorance on the masses (proved through lower voter turnout) o Normative View (Positive): elections provide testing grounds for charismatic leaders who are given the directive of the people and must choose how to direct themselves – they offer the only chance of over-riding the bureaucracy o Normative View (Positive): it offers the opportunity to dismiss ineffective leaders from office ∴ providing a certain degree of protection for the people o Normative View (Positive): there are other sources of power, elites can be challenged by other social actors • Democracy = less the rule of the people and more the rule of the elite o Elite combines leaders and bureaucratic experts • Despite the positives, he believes that under democracy, freedom is highly constrained by the impersonal administration – but this pessimistic view is generally due to his belief that people are ignorant – broadening definition of politics = see more social engagement and activity Elite Theorists • An inevitability of society is a minority ruling over a majority – ask how and why • Are concerned with the decision-makers of society, who hold power as a cohesive, relatively self-conscious group • Roberto Michels: o Concentration of power by elite is inevitable o Focus of analyzing political parties o Parties need to be highly organized ∴ become oligarchic = creation of hierarchy which excludes most members from decision-making process • Joseph Schumpeter: o Takes Michels’ view on political parties and Weber’s view on democracy o Democracy ≠ rule by people o Democracy = political party elites competing for votes – once elected professional politicians are allowed to rule with the help of bureaucracy of expert administrators => stability required for political system • C.W. Mills o Proposed the “Institutional Elite Theory: o Believes that elitism of US in 20 century is a hindrance to democracy rather than a factor that makes it possible o Power became concentrated and unified in 3 groups: military, corporate, political o These 3 + one-way communication of media (as controlled by elite) = makes ordinary citizens ignorant + sad at their lack of control over their lives • Ralph Miliband (Marxist Elitist Theorist): o Similarities to Mills: capitalist class assures its reproduction through its close links with leaders of political parties, civil service, media and military o Difference: Mills claims that elitists not unified necessarily through shared economic interests o RELATIVEAUTONOMY Pluralism • View citizens as actively involved in politics with differing interests that do not need to be ruled by an elite • Politics is a matter of competing interest groups too – none can completely dominate since all have different resources • State itself is a set of competing/conflicting institutions rather than a monolithic entity ∴ they don’t use the word state, but government • Democratic politics involves endless bargaining in order to influence government policy, which is nothing more than a compromise between differing interest groups involved in the political process Neo-Pluralists • Neo-pluralists: do agree that elites (esp. corporate elites) as having a greater degree of influence of govt. policy than other groups – constricting effective influence of other groups • ∴ Neo-pluralists is a convergence of neo-Marxism, pluralism and radical elite theory o Differ from elite theory: elite are not unified + not capable of manipulating citizens into accepting elite rule o Differ from Pluralists: ?????????? o Differ from the neo-Marxists: although business may on occasion subvert the democratic process, it is only in particular places –state politics is primary it cannot be that state is ultimately
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1 and half of page 2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit