WDW151H1 Chapter Notes - Chapter 9: Brookings Institution, Gang, Mandatory Sentencing
Refer to groups or persons not covered by traditional social security system
▪
Being shut out from any social, economic, political, cultural systems that determine social integration
▪
Multi-dimensionality - connected in some areas, excluded in others
▪
In countries lacking wealth, citizens may feel deprived
▪
Defining Social Exclusion
○
Anyone for whom the street has become a habitual abode and who isn't cared for or supervised by a responsible adult
▪
More likely to engage in crime
▪
Engaged because of current adverse situation, not because of their home/background
▪
Squeegee kids lived better and were less likely to commit crimes because they had an income
▪
More troubled background = more crime and worse nature
▪
Homeless youth are more vulnerable to exploitation
▪
Homeless Youth
○
Group of recurrently associated individuals with identifiable leadership claiming control over territory and engaging in forms of illegal behaviour
▪
Economic disenfranchisement and social disorganization
▪
Modernization of gangs - better weapons
▪
Minorities, disadvantaged
▪
Factors for participating: power and respect, money, protection, social support
▪
Youth Gangs
○
Discriminatory treatment and economic / social inequality
□
Overrepresented in prison populations
▪
Improve conditions of community to lower rates
▪
Aboriginal People in Canada
○
Motivated by antagonisms towards race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, religion
▪
Legislation trying to protect against socially excluded groups
▪
Culture of hate --> targeting people not part of the ingroup
▪
Hate Crime
○
Domestic violence: any act or omission done that is perceived as psychological, socially, economically or physically harmful
▪
May not leave because fear and uncertainty or economic exclusion
▪
'learned helplessness' - passive state, can't fight back
▪
Change in legislation to broaden definition of sexual assault
▪
Violence Against Women
○
O’Grady, Crime in the Canadian Context, “Chapter 6: Crime and Social Exclusion,” 142-173.
□
More population in prison than any other nation
○
Rising crime rates in 1970's and 1980's
▪
Believed that rehabilitation doesn't work
○
1975-2002 mandatory sentencing laws, minimum sentences
○
More distant rich become from poor the harsher sentences become
○
Eduardo Porter, “In the US, Punishment Comes Before the Crimes,” New York Times April 29, 2014. (Can be accessed online)
□
Crime rates have been declining
○
Low income individuals are more likely to break the law
○
Most under 30
○
Youths most likely to engage in riskier types of crimes
○
Federal / state policies have increased incarceration rates
○
70% chance black man without a high school education will be jailed before the age of 30
○
Per capita expenditures have increased over 3 times over 30 years
○
Young black kids most likely to have a jailed father before they grow up
○
Juvenile record has a lasting impact on youth's futures
○
Melissa S. Kearney and Benjamin H. Harris, “The Hamilton Project: Ten Economic Facts about Crime and Incarceration in the US”(May 2014). Available at:
http://www.hamiltonproject.org/papers/ten_economic_facts_about_crime_and_incarceration_in_the_united_states/
□
9: Coping with Crime II
November 9, 2016
10:17 PM
READINGS Page 1
Document Summary
O"grady, crime in the canadian context, chapter 6: crime and social exclusion, 142-173. Refer to groups or persons not covered by traditional social security system. Being shut out from any social, economic, political, cultural systems that determine social integration. Multi-dimensionality - connected in some areas, excluded in others. In countries lacking wealth, citizens may feel deprived. Anyone for whom the street has become a habitual abode and who isn"t cared for or supervised by a responsible adult. Engaged because of current adverse situation, not because of their home/background. Squeegee kids lived better and were less likely to commit crimes because they had an income. More troubled background = more crime and worse nature. Group of recurrently associated individuals with identifiable leadership claiming control over territory and engaging in forms of illegal behaviour. Factors for participating: power and respect, money, protection, social support. Motivated by antagonisms towards race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, religion. Legislation trying to protect against socially excluded groups.