Textbook Notes (369,133)
Canada (162,403)
Anthropology (211)
Chapter 2

Chapter 2.docx

8 Pages
47 Views

Department
Anthropology
Course Code
Anthropology 2100
Professor
Peter Timmins

This preview shows pages 1,2 and half of page 3. Sign up to view the full 8 pages of the document.
Description
Chapter 2: Putting the Picture Together • Diderot and D’Alembert:  2 philosophers of the French Enlightenment  Wanted to write an encyclopedia that would collect all human knowledge into a series of massive tomes.  Their plan failed. • Archaeological theory:  Consists of the ideas archaeologists have developed about the past and about the ways we come to know it. 2.1 Origins ofArchaeology • Earliest evidence of ancient objects comes from early Mesopotamia, Egypt, and China. • The first clear evidence for the use of excavation to recover and explore the past was in Renaissance Europe. th • In the 19 century, antiquarians had problems distinguishing between human manufactured objects and objects made by natural processes.  For example: ground stone axes were believed to be “thunderstones.” o Thunderstones – objects that formed in spots where lightning struck the Earth.  Arrowheads were identified as fossilized serpent tongues. • There was still now method of determining the age of artifacts. 2.2 The Emergence of Archaeology • 19 century was when archaeology emerged as a clearly defined discipline. • Two major achievements of 19 century archaeologists: 1. the Three-Age system 2. the determination of the depth of human antiquity Organizing Time • The Three-Age system:  Helped figure out the age of the objects and how to group them.  Developed by Christian Jurgensen Thomsen (Trigger).  He was given the job of cataloguing collections.  His solution was to divide the collections into the relics of three periods – the StoneAge (earliest), the BronzeAge, and the IronAge (latest) – based on the material of the manufacture.  Also recognized that some stone and bronze artifacts continued to be manufactured in later periods. The Establishment of Human Antiquity • Now the early 1800s and scientists are starting to talk about the evolution of life • Jean Baptiste Lamarck:  French zoologist  Developed an evolutionary framework for the history of life on earth based on the inheritance of acquired characteristics • Bishop James Ussher:  Believed creation = 4004 BC. • Theologians disagreed with the idea that “man descended from the apes.” • Beginning in the late 1850s, everything began to change. • Evidence for the existence of human remains together with the remains of extinct animals was irrefutable. • In 1857, a Neanderthal skull was discovered near Germany • In 1859, the publication of Charles Darwin’s “On The Origin of Species” solidified the theory of evolution • The turning point in the recognition of the depth of human antiquity came from the interaction between two very different scientists – Jacques Boucher de Perthes and Charles Lyell • Jacques Boucher de Perthes:  Wrote a series of books describing his discovery of tools of human manufacture together with bones of extinct mammoths and rhinoceros in the deep gravel deposits of the Somme Valley. • Charles Lyell:  Concluded that human existence dates far back in geological time. • The StoneAge is divided into two periods:  Neolithic (New StoneAge) – the period in which there are polished stone tools  Paleolithic (Old StoneAge) – the period in which humans lived with now- extinct animals. Imperial Archaeology • Treasure hunters • Giovanni Belzoni:  Acircus strongman turned Egyptian explorer  The purpose of his researches was to rob the Egyptians of their papyri. • Heinrich Schliemann:  Obsessed with finding Troy 2.3 Developing Method and Theory • Basic tools of archaeology began to develop during the early 20 century Stratigraphic Method and Culture History • In Egypt and Palestine, Sir Flinders Petrie pioneered the methods of stratigraphic excavation and Seriation • Methods included the Pecos Classification and the Midwestern Taxonomic method. V. Gordon Childe • Was an active Marxist • Said to have a near-photographic memory  Allowed him to make comparisons and recognize patterning in the archaeological collections across Europe  Archaeology showed him that societies have undergone 2 revolutions:  Neolithic Revolution: led to the emergence of settled villages practicing agriculture.  Urban Revolution: led to the appearance of cities and complex forms of gov’t. • We can compare Childe’s ideas with Thomsen’s Three-Age system:  Thomsen focused on the classification of objects and thus created major periods – the StoneAge, BronzeAge, and IronAge.  Similarly, Lubbock split the StoneAge into Paleolithic and Neolithic.  Childe shifted the focus from artifacts to societies of people living in a network of social and economic relations.  Childe believed that the great changes we see in archaeological record are evidence of chances in society, because the material aspects of culture are intimately connected to social and economic relations.  Thus, for Childe, the presence of bronze artifacts presupposes a society that was able to gain access to tin and copper 2.4 Archaeology as Science Developing Scientific Methods • Graham Clar excavated areas at Star Carr to get insight into the subsistence practices of late prehistoric hunters.  Subsistence: o Refers to the activities involved in procuring and processing food. • There are methods for recovering botanical remains from sites • There are statistical methods for archaeology  A.C. Spaulding argued that archaeologists should not impose categories on material culture, but rather should discover clustering through statistical analysis of attributes. The New Archaeology • New Archaeology (or processual archaeology):  An approach to archaeology based firmly on scientific method and supported by a concerted effort aimed at the development of theory.  The catalyst in this movement was Lewis Binford o He believes that archaeology should be a science or nothing at all o Did not view the work of archaeologists as science o For archaeology to be a science, he believed, it must work by deduction from general laws ad models  Deduction: drawing particular inferences from general laws and models.  The New Archaeologists were the first to argue that the central problem of the field was not the need for more data or even better methods; rather, they questioned the way archaeologists could know the past.  Archaeologists tend to work by induction: o Drawing inferences on the basis of available empirical data. • Alison Wylie showed through careful analysis that all archaeologists have to use induction at some point in their research. • Binford had a question about how we can know about processes that took place in the past. He emphasized the following:  Middle-range research: o Allows us to make secure statements about past dynamics on the basis of observations made on archaeological material. o The key to middle-range research is to look at processes that we can observe in the present and analyze the material patterning left by those processes. o We can then develop hypotheses about the past that can be tested by references to our observations in the present. • Cultural Resource Management (CRM): 
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1,2 and half of page 3 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit