Political Science 3388E Chapter Notes -Preferential Trading Area, Economic Sanctions, Suharto

96 views6 pages
Donnelly Chapter 9
Human Rights and Foreign Policy
1. Human Rights: A Legitimate Concern for Foreign Policy?
Three standard arguments connecting HR with foreign policy:
1) Realists reject a concern for international HR because foreign
policy (FP) ought to be about the national interests defined in
terms of power
2) Statists (or legalists) consider an active concern for the HR
practices of other states as inconsistent with the fundamental
principle of state sovereignty.
3) Relativists (or pluralists) views international HR policies as moral
A. The Realist Argument (Morgenthau)
For Morgenthau, FP must be about “national interests defined in
terms of power.” Morality is appropriate to individual nations but
not the relation of the state
Morgenthau, “the principle of the defense of HR cannot be
consistently applied in foreign policy because it can and must
come in conflict with other interests that may be more important
than the defense of human rights in a particular circumstance.”
Interests are not reducible to power
Donnelly- in certain circumstances it may be unwise to pursue
human rights, but that must be determined empirically, case by
case. Realists are not entitled to categorically exclude HR as a
legitimate goal of FP
B. The Statist (Legalist) Argument
IR is structured around the principle of sovereignty. Sovereignty
in turn implies nonintervention in the internal affairs of other
states. The statist argues that HR must be excluded from FP
because what a state does with respect to its own nationals on
its own territory is a matter of sovereign national jurisdiction and
thus of no legitimate concern of other states.
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-2 of the document.
Unlock all 6 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Donnelly- International law can be seen as a body of restrictions
of the sovereignty that have been accepted by states through
the mechanism of custom and treaty. HR have become
legitimate subjects in IR because sovereign states have chosen
to make them so.
The weakness of existing international implementation and
enforcement mechanisms (Ch. 8) might allow statists to argue
that incorporating HR into FP still contravenes the fundamental
principle of non intervention, but numerous instruments of FP
(eg, diplomatic representations and granting/ withdrawing
preferential trade agreements) do not involve intervention. Such
means may be used on behalf of HR as legitimately as they are
used on behalf of other goals of HR. Illegitimate intervention
involves strongly coercive, dictatorial means.
C. The Relativist (Pluralist) Argument
A country’s social and political order should be, on its face,
entirely a matter of domestic jurisdiction.
Within a certain range of freedom, the autonomous choices of a
free people should be restricted. This stresses the positive value
of cultural diversity and respect for the values of other peoples
and cultures
Kennan argues that “there are no internationally accepted
standards of morality to which the US government could appeal
if it wished to act in the name of moral principles”… Donnelly
argues that this is not true in the case of HR
Donnelly- To act on behalf of internationally recognized HR is not
to impose one’s own values on other countries. It involves
bringing the practices of governments in line with their own
professed values (which we share)
There are authoritative int. HR norms. As long as HR policy is
based on these norms, it does not reflect moral imperialism.
Certain acts, practices, and customs do not deserve our respect
even if they are tradition.
2. International HR and National Identity
States pursue HR in their FP for many reasons, but a significant reason
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-2 of the document.
Unlock all 6 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Get OneClass Notes+

Unlimited access to class notes and textbook notes.

YearlyBest Value
75% OFF
$8 USD/m
$30 USD/m
You will be charged $96 USD upfront and auto renewed at the end of each cycle. You may cancel anytime under Payment Settings. For more information, see our Terms and Privacy.
Payments are encrypted using 256-bit SSL. Powered by Stripe.