Textbook Notes (367,844)
Canada (161,454)
Psychology (4,882)
Prof (18)
Chapter 12

Human Sexuality ch.12.docx

11 Pages
125 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
Psychology 2075
Professor
Prof
Semester
Winter

Description
Attraction, Love And Communication Human Sexuality – Chapter 12 Attraction  Gender is an important component of attraction- some are only attracted to men, some only to women, and some to both  Most research on attraction has been limited to male-female relationships The girl next door  We are more likely to be attracted to someone who we have had multiple interactions with  This is the mere-exposure effect: the tendency to like a person more if we have been exposed to him or her repeatedly  Hence, the girl next door Birds of a feather  We tend to like people who are similar to us  For example homophily: the tendency to have contact with people who are equal in social status  The greatest homophily is by race and ethnicity  Only 3.9 percent of couple are from mixed unions (different ethnicity’s)  54 percent of Canadian couples have the same level of education  46 percent of couples prefer a spouse who shares their religious views, and 34 percent prefer if their spouse shares the same ethnic background  Study: o Donn Byrne 1971 o Gave people questionnaires after they had filled one out o The person thought it was random, but the questionnaire was given and was either a lot like them or not at all o If the questionnaire was a lot like theirs, they rated them as more likeable  Research in Manitoba suggests that the more satisfied individuals were with their relationships, the more they assume the other person is similar to them  Matching phenomenon: the tendency for men and women to choose as partners people who match them, that is who are similar in attitudes, intelligence and attractiveness  Folk tale birds of a feather flock together has some truth  There is also some truth to opposites attract  Study: o Dominant (D) and submissive (S) were paired o Higher satisfaction when it was D + S o Lowe satisfaction with D + D and S + S  KEY- similarity in attitudes is important but similarity in personalities is not  Study: o Real married heterosexual couples showed that there values were similar (age, race and education) o But it showed that there personalities were no more similar than those who were randomly paired together o The average participant was 28 years old o Similarity on attachment styles was associated with indicators of martial satisfaction but similarity in attitudes was not o Revised folk tale “birds of a feather (attitudinal similar) may flock, but not stick together” 1 Physical attractiveness  People prefer partners who are physically attractive  Study: o Snapshots of university students were taken and then rated on their physical attractiveness o Women that were rater more physically attractive were also more popular (had more dates in the last year) o This was also shown with men but not as prominent  With a study involving African Americans they rated women more beautiful if they had a lighter skin tone  Physical attractiveness is rated one of the most important things (body size, and facial features)  Physical attractiveness is more important to males than females (…pigs.)  Perception of attractiveness is also influenced by their intelligence and liking and respect  Most people rate themselves a 6.7 out of ten (on average) but rate their partners on average an 8 out of ten  Study: o Asked women if they would prefer and extraordinary face with and ordinary body or and ordinary face with and extraordinary body o 57 percent of women said they prefer an ordinary body with and extraordinary face The interpersonal Marketplace  We tend to pair off with who we think we can “buy” the most with  Women’s worth is based off their beauty, and men’s worth is based of their success  Study: o Girls rated more attractive in high school were more likely to have husbands who had higher incomes  Study: o Women asked to rate men o The more attractive women though that middle class jobs for men were unacceptable, were as uglier women thought it was moderately acceptable From the laboratory to real life  Study: o To see if these results stated above would happen in real life o Administered an attitude and personality questionnaire to 420 university students o Then they formed 44 couples, for half of the couples, both people had made very similar responses, for the other half the two people made very different responses o The two people were then introduced and sent on a date o When returned the experimenter looked at how close they stood to one another when they got back o The participants also evaluated the dates o Results showed that if they had more in common on the questionnaire and were paired they were more attracted to the person o When the semester ended, those who were similar to them and physically attractive, they were more likely to remember there name  Agreeableness is shown to be important when first meeting someone 2 Attraction online  Four sources that lead to the increase in online dating o 1. Growing proportion of the population is single so more people are looking o 2. Career and time pressures lead to people to seek more efficient ways to look o 3. Single people are highly mobile, increasing the difficulty of meeting someone o 4. Workplace romance is less acceptable due to concerns about sexual harassment  There is no longer as stigma associated with online dating  Also makes it easier to meet someone if you are lesbian, gay or bisexual  Also allows discretion and the reduced feelings of rejection  Allows people who prefer things like bondage to find more people also interested in those things  Users say and advantage to this is that it makes people focus on their interests  It is found that people who meet online don’t have as much intimacy as those who have met face to face  Risks are that the person may not be honest on their profile  One quarter of Canadians using online dating admit to have misrepresent themselves  Now there are websites where they match you “scientifically” – eHarmony  Each site has there own matching strategy o eHarmony uses 436 questions to asses a broad range of attitudes o Chemistry.com uses 146 item survey questions to match hormones associated with calmness, popularity rationality and sympathy o Perfectmatch.com uses the duet system- based on 48 questions assessing 8 domains  Stats on how successful peoples relationships are, are on page 338 Explaining our preferences  Why do people prefer partners who are similar to them and who are more attractive  Reinforcement theory: Byrne’s Law of attraction o We tend to like people who give us reinforcements or rewards and to dislike people who give us punishments o Our attraction to another person is proportionate to the number of reinforcement that person gives us relative to the total number of reinforcements plus punishments the person gives us o So people date people like them to avoid hostility that could be caused by different interests o We prefer people that are attractive because they are better accepted by Canadian society o We like people who are high in society because we like the material things that people find rewarding and these things cost money  Sociobiology: sexual strategies theory o People choose mates so they can have the most successful offspring (reproduction) o Men need to identify reproductively valuable women o Also men want to be sure about the paternity of the child so they want to make sure that they are faithful o People who are more attractive are seen as more fertile hence why people seek attractive mates o Women want men that are reproductively valuable because they have a lot to invest in a child, they are pregnant for nine months and then must care for the baby o This is also why they want men with good income so that they can invest in their kids o This is not as true now a days because more and more women are becoming self sufficient (hells yes) 3 Intimacy Defining intimacy  Perlman and Fehr gave this definition of intimacy: “openness, honesty, mutual self-disclosure, caring, warmth, protecting, helping, being devoted to each other, mutually attentive, mutually committed, surrendering control, dropping defenses, becoming emotional, feeling distressed when separation occurs  Then Prager expanded on this by defining the difference between intimate interactions and intimate relationships  Intimate interactions include both intimate experiences and intimate behaviours  Intimate experiences: the meaning a person gives to their interactions with another person o Associated with positive emotions o Like meeting your partners family  Intimate behaviours are more concrete like eye contact and smiling  However the most common intimate behaviour is self disclosure to your partner  Intimate relationship: a relationship in which intimate interactions occur on a regular and predictable basis. Characterized by affection between partners, mutual trust and partner cohesiveness  Intimate interactions can occur outside of an intimate relationship  Intimacy: a quality of relationships characterized by commitment, feelings of closeness and trust and self disclosure  Intimacy must be reciprocated but not equally  Even though intimacy has a physical dimension, it does not need to be successful Intimacy and self-disclosure  Self disclosure: telling a person things about yourself  People should censor their thoughts that are deliberate and hurtful to their partner  Self disclosure usually leads to the partner reciprocating it  This happens because maybe you like or trust the person more, simple modeling or imitation could occur, or you try to maintain a sense of balance  Couples that practice more self disclosure are more satisfied  Same with people that disclose more of their sexual likes and dislikes are more satisfied  The greater self disclosure the more likely the relationship will continue  If the person does not accept what we self disclose, we can feel betrayed  Self disclosure also promotes intimacy in a relationship – however that does not mean that they increase consistently Measuring intimacy  Personal assessment of intimacy in relationships (PAIR)  Measures emotional intimacy with items like: “ my partner listens to me when I need someone to talk to”  Another scale includes: “ how often to you confide very personal info to him or her”  MORE EXAMPLES 343 4 Love  There is an obvious connection between love and sex  At one end there is hookups (love is really sex) and the other relationships (sex is non essential)  Toward the middle there is the sex is really love view- this is a relationship that balances the two Theories of love  The triangular theory of love o Robert Sternberg, says love has three fundamental components; intimacy, passion and commitment o Intimacy is the emotional component of love, involves mutual understanding, giving and receiving emotional support – this may be found between friends and parents o Passion is the motivational component of love, including physical attraction and the drive for sexual expression, arousal is important, this is what differentiates romantic love from other components of love o These two are often intertwined, and passion could come first in a relationship or intimacy o Commitment has two aspects: short term (one loves another) and long term (commitment to maintain that relationship) o This is what makes relationships last o If you have all three levels of this, then you have consummate love o Love in action: Sternberg also argues that each of the three components of love must be translated into action o Intimacy is expressed in actions like communicating personal thoughts o Passion is expressed in actions like kissing o Commitment is expressed in saying I love you o Evidence for Sternberg’s Triangular theory: he produces a questionnaire to measure the three components of love, he makes several predictions for how the scores will change over time; commitment scores increased when couples were married, behavioural intimacy decreased, and also found that intimacy was most related to sexual behaviour  The Attachment theory of love o Though that our early attachment experiences with out mothers effects the rest of our lives o Adults are characterized in their romantic relationships by one of four attachments styles: based on our perceptions of ourselves and how other respond to us o THE DIAGRAM OF THIS IS ON PAGE 345 FIGURE 12.5 hard to explain o Secure lovers have a sense of their own lovability and the expectation that other people are generally accepting and responsive o Preoccupied lovers have a sense of their own un-lovability but a positive evaluation of other people o Fearful lovers have a negative expectation of both themselves and other people 5 o Dismissing lovers feel themselves to be worthy of love but have negative views of other people o Dismissing and fearful- similar because they both avoid intimacy o Preoccupied and fearful lovers- similar because they both need acceptance from others to feel good about themselves o Most prominent in people is secure (49%) followed by fearful, dismissing and preoccupied o Separation from parents has nothing to do with attachment styles (divorce) o Your quality of relationships with your parents and peers growing up does have an effect on attachment styles o Securely attached kids at 12 months were rated more socially competent, which predicted better friendship at 16, and predicted more positive daily emotional experiences at age 20-23 o Shows us that adults bring to any particular romantic relationship their own past history o Also shows that conflict in relationships could be do to different attachments styles o Evidence shows that people who have poor attachment with family may have secure attachment in a relationship o This theory provides some explanation of jealousy: common among preoccupied lovers o Women who have insecure attachment styles engage in intercourse at a younger age and have more sexual partners than do women with secure attachment styles o Study:  Individuals with a secure attachment reported responding constructively to potentially destructive behaviour by the partner, for example with efforts to discuss and resolve the problem  Individuals with a avoidant attachment style enter into new relationships, they expect that their partner will not engage in behaviours that signify commitment – this leads them to think that the relationship will end  Participants with a secure attachment style did not change their feelings about the relationship  Participants with one of the insecure attachment styles reported lower levels of satisfaction and commitment over time o Quebec Study has shown that people in an avoidant attachment engage in sex less frequently – also been shown to have low sexual satisfaction  Love as a story o These stories shape our beliefs about love and relationships and our beliefs in turn influence our behaviour o There is more to love than interaction; what matters is how each partner interprets the interaction o A love story: is about what love should be like, including characters, a plot and a theme o Falling in love occurs when you meet someone with whom you can create a relationship that fits your love story o Further we are satisfied with relationships in which ou
More Less

Related notes for Psychology 2075

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit