Textbook Notes (369,203)
Canada (162,462)
Psychology (4,938)
Chapter 5

Chapter 5

4 Pages
81 Views

Department
Psychology
Course Code
Psychology 2660A/B
Professor
Natalie J Allen

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 4 pages of the document.
Description
Chapter 5: Personnel Decisions The social context for personnel decisions  I/O psychologists and members of the organization contribute the process of making personnel decisions  Organizations operate within the social and cultural context in which they are embedded  Nepotism – an approach to personnel staffing whereby family members receive preferential treatment o In the US, nepotism is viewed negatively because it results in unequal opportunity among job applicants o In non-Western cultures, nepotism is viewed positively  Logic: a family member is a known commodity who can be trusted to be loyal  Personnel decisions do not “stand apart” unrelated to the larger social system  The first documented personnel selection test in history is in the Bible – shibboleth (those who couldn’t pronounce it correctly were executed)  Forces that affect personnel decisions and outcomes (some don’t even reference these) o Organization and organizational needs o Scientific theory o Research and development o Assessment of qualifications o Assessment-based decisions o Cultural values  End product of personnel selection process is to offer employment to some people, and deny it to others  The way some organizations hire people in real life tends to be more intuitive, nonquantitative, not based on validated, empirically derived factors  Some managers decline the use of scientific evidence in place of just a hunch – this will not improve selection decisions  Cross-cultural differences in personnel selection: Preferences in ideal job candidates o Universalist cultures – favor rational argument, follow what they see as universal codes of practice and rules  US, Canada, Australia o Particularist cultures – more emphasis on relationships, willing to bend the rules in making selection decisions, rely more on interviews  France, Greece, Italy o Japanese and Chinese = neutral, reserved approach o South European / South American = more emotional o There may be similarities in cross-cultural selection methods, but there can be strong cultural differences in the desired performance of the candidate Recruitment  Recruitment – process by which individuals are solicited to apply for jobs  The state of the economy will have a strong effect on how many people express interest in becoming employees  Different recruiting approaches are used depending on the job level in question  Search firms – serve clientele at the higher job level – fee might be 50% of the person’s salary  “if recruiting strategies don’t help identify a sizeable and suitable pool of talent even the most accurate selection process will be of little or no use  During high unemployment – organizations sift through candidates looking for the best candidate  During low unemployment – now the candidates sift through organizations, looking for their ideal employer  More often, recruiting is a middling position – organizations and people try to figure out if they are a perfect match – mating approach to meet the needs of both parties  Positive word of mouth channels was associated with perceptions of organizational attractiveness and behavioral outcomes  Onsite visits – shows the candidates that the organization is serious about them – serves to affirm the value each party holds for each other  Success in getting candidates interested in joining an organization is not the same as actually getting new employees to join the organization  Social validity – the quality of a selection process that makes it acceptable to job applicants o The social validity of selection procedures was the strongest correlate with applicant’s favorable reactions to the organization  French college students were more favorably disposed to graphology as a selection method o US college students were more accepting of biographical info  Study: candidate reactions to a full-day multistage personnel selection procedure o The rejected candidates viewed the assessment process as fair and reasonable to the extent they felt the various assessments allowed them the “opportunity to perform” (show the organization their skills)  Perceptions of fairness in personnel selection are enhanced when candidates have sufficient time and resources to be assessed under conditions free of distraction  Explain why they were denied employment in a way that reduces negative feelings and damage to self esteem A model of personnel decisions  Sequence of factors associated with making personnel decisions:  Work and organizational analyses  Criteria and their measurement; Predictors and their measurement  Linkage between predictors and criteria: validity (regression analysis)  Design of recruitment strategies  Selection systems and factors affecting their use  Assessing the utility of selection systems  Set of principles for the validation / use of personnel selection procedures o Specify scientific findings and accepted professional practices o Focuses on the accuracy of the inferences that underlie employment decisions Regression analysis  Regression analysis – statistical procedure used to predict one variable on the basis of another variable  It is used to predict criterion performance on the basis of a predictor score  Although a correlation coefficient is useful for showing the degree of relationship between two variables, it is not useful for predicting one variable from a person’s status on another variable o Regression analysis does permit us to predict a person’s status on one variable (criterion) based on their status on another variable (predictor) – relationship is usually linear  Multiple predictors o Combining two or more predictors may improve the predictability of the criterion o If the two predictors are unrelated to each other, the predict different aspects of the criterion o Multiple correlation – the combined relationship between two or more predictors and the criterion  The degree of predictability (ranging from 0 – 1.00) in forecasting one variable on the basis of two or more other variables o It is rare for two predictors related to one criterion are unrelated to each other – meaning all of the criterion variance accounted for by the second predictor is not new variance (part of it was explained by the first predictor) o It is generally advisable to seek predictors that are related to the criterion but unrelated to each other (can explain more aspects of the criterion)  Multiple regression analysis o Multiple regression analysis – statistical procedure used to predict one variable on the basis of two or more other variables o Usually enhances prediction of the criterion o Regression equations with four or five predictors usually are as accurate as those with more Validity genera
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit