Sociology 2267A/B Chapter Notes - Chapter 12: Juvenile Court, Multisystemic Therapy, Moral Panic

64 views13 pages
Chapter 12- A Century After the Fact: What Do We Know? Where Are We Going?
Introduction:
Imp struct change JJS came 1980s, w Young Off Act (YOA) and intro alt measures,
change maint and strengthened extrajudicial measures YCJA
YCJA also intro struct change w provisions adult sents, thereby eroding fund precept
juvenile justice system- separateness from adult system and Bill C-10 cont move
Hundred years ago talked about “delinquents”, then by 1970s “young off” and now
“youth criminals”
Rethinking juvenile justice:
What we know:
All crime rates CN down, including violent and youth crime- yet moral panic still rages
and public cont warned about new frightening dangers and threats, even from toddlers
V few young people CN actually involved crim activity and justice system and majority
off involved minor off- youth crime always seems be issue every new gen adults
Lesson should have learned from examination hist juvenile justice and cont reform efforts
is our system is failing children and youth= failing provide care and protection need and
should be entitled under UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
Should have learned supervision and institutionalization punitive, repressive control
measures and not solutions youth crime (can be mechanisms and tools perpetuate
injustices)
Answering the questions:
Social constructionist persp= crime, criminal, dangerous and other labels ass young
people and actions social constructions, products social activity and enterprise
Birmingham School- public discourses youth crime and justice moral panics and youth
measuring stick all “good” about our soc and all adults hope and dream for future
Youth and kids scapegoats all good in soc and for all adults fear about themselves= comp
good old days, kids not so bad, disrespectful, crim, disobedient and out of control
Labels all moral statements adults fear, opposed what value and wish for
Perceived threats and sig one is youth crime and inability YJS control it= youth crisis
Media texts:
Specific and consistent texts in public discourse- moral panics and youth crisis fears=
revolve around intersections race, class, gender, sexuality and colonialism (not gen)
Discourse and constructions not about behav prob; about who engaging in behav/ who
receiving end behav and why both signals danger
Violence constructed prob when white, middle-class girls and boys seen engage and
when victims white and middle-class/ adults/ elderly
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 13 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Child and youth victimization by adults not prob unless perpetuated by stranger- youth
crisis seems arise each new gen, crisis changes when dom hierarchies based on classism,
racism, sexism and heterosexism challenged
Locating change: Global Context:
Juvenile justice system is governance designed set rules about how youth are to be
governed, reg and managed- inf moral crisis and youth crisis discourse, also infl and
informed larger changes at national and global levels ex: internat comm moved toward
est legal standards human rights and children’s rights, so did CN gov
Reflected intro legal protections YOA and sim approp mods YCJA, restrictions use
custody and more legally correct mechanism bringing more and younger youth under
jurisdiction adult system- balanced internat stands w interests CN lobby groups
Moved neoliberal form governance, some ref more actuarial and managerial modes gov
and reg= setting targets and perf indicators enable auditing efficiency and effectiveness,
costing and testing all activities ensure value for money
Gov philosophies changed welfare orientation w rehabilitation focus (JDA)→ liberal
orientation w justice/ rights focus (YOA)→ neolib orientation (YCJA)
Changed rehabilitating delinquent, to reintegrating young off, to making youth
accountable, to being concerned youth at risk (inconsistent and changing)
Since 2000, Stats CN changing police reporting stats, collecting dif kinds info, such as
gang rel crime and breaking youth apprehensions into charged and cleared otherwise
Changed how info distributed- used be readily accessible libraries now only avail online
in condensed form/ for fee= more info gov controlled ever before (fed gov controls what
known crime and justice, more so now than ever before)
Locating change: Criminological context:
From disorganization theory came Chicago Area Project, 1940-1950s under direction
soc- detached street worker considered most unique and promising feat project
Mobilization for Youth Project NY 1960s, involved comm org self-help and 1970s, Cali
Youth Services Bureau, where comm leaders and agencies hired profs deliver services
youth in comm (attempt dev diversionary progs)
CN hist, sim most US outside large projects mentioned above, been on hodgepodge
single-factor, single-agency approaches programming based on whatever appealed staff
at part agency
Primary reason US leadership in field= unis have infrastruct support large-scale crim
research projects that also includes generous gov and corporate funding
1970s, Martinson’s “nothing works” and growing infl labelling theory, paved way
philosophy radical non-intervention and diversionary policies and programs- treatment
dem ineff, fallout large-scale urban projects also cont notions comm restoration projects
such as Chicago Area Project wasted efforts- leaving alone been just as eff and far less
expensive (non-intervention keep out prisons)
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 13 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Late 1970s-80s became era comm-based prog delivered through group homes and variety
residential facilities
Large-scale, gov-funded, longitudinal research agendas early 1990s, involving teams US
researchers based efforts dev integrative theories predict del- multiple paths to del,
opened door dev crim lifecourse approach understanding del causation and ended w
single-factor approach prog= more comprehensive comm-wide approach prog involve
multiple aspects child’s life
Seeds multisystemic intervention approach del control, as well emph on risk and
resiliency imp concepts understanding del and how respond effectively
Control texts:
Hist del theory, always gap b/w theory, research accompanies and actual prog youth-
often progs dev response need, while changing directions prog may come from changing
prefs, new directions and innovative border crossings-theoretical and research directions
cross boundaries b/w disciplines and perspectives
New directions 21st cent attributed David Hawkins and Richard Catalano, integrating
concepts medical/ health field w del causation research, able bridge gap b/w causation
theory and prog- used ident risk and protective factors and prog= reducing risk factors
and building and promoting protective factors
Delinquency prog talk finally moved away from theory into realm conducive neolib gov
styles
Science of prevention:
21st cent= crime-prevention discourse, not treatment and rehab, and talk at-risk youth,
resiliency and protective factors
Lots research, energy and gov money devoted dev ass tools allow ident high/ low risk
levels individ youth- prog strats designed and eval pot reduce risk crime individ youth
and comm
Body of research beginning dev around cost effectiveness prog relative crim activity ex:
home intervention costly (CN progs funded fed crime prevention progs required provide
sim cost-ben analysis, saw w multisystemic therapy)
Assess utility progs and part govs decide which project proposals receive gov funding
implementation
Meta-analysis helps ident not only what works in terms risk reduction, but also how long
takes reduce risk- shortest and cheapest way reduce crime
Measuring prog succ terms recidivism feeds crime-control/law-and-order agenda
Where are we going?
Juvenile justice more than law and admin and system governance- also package includes
youth, behav and how respond legally and inform, as well assumptions, beliefs and
philosophies underlie both law and system gov and laws, policies and practices dev from
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 13 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents