ADMS 2511 Chapter Notes - Chapter 2: Enterprise Resource Planning, Corporate Governance Of Information Technology, E-Commerce
58 views7 pages
2 Aug 2013
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Purpose of it governance is to provide effective oversight over the use of technology. Steering committee is important to manage information technology in an organization, while governance is important to manage it throughout the organization. Includes planning, acquisition, implementations and ongoing support, as well as monitoring and evaluation so that decisions can be made about potential changes. Many things may go wrong without governance. Include objectives not being met, systems could be error prone, over budget, or hard to use. Smaller businesses implement it governance by having an aware and knowledgeable owner-manager who actively selects business practices and software. Organizations select such systems so they can thrive and compete. Inside your organization it provides: platform, infrastructure, transaction processing systems, Enterprise resources planning systems and functional area"s is. Outside your organization it provides: supply chain management, customer relationship. Collects, processes, stores, analyses, and disseminates information for a specific purpose.
Get access
Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers
Related Documents
Related Questions
Required: After reading the Bye, Bye SOX? Article comment on the issue of small business compliance with Section 404 of SOX
Bye, Bye, SOX? | |
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) | SOX compliance has been extended |
may be declawed by upcoming | four times, but they wonât need to |
U.S. Congress and | comply at all if the Garrett-Adler |
Supreme Court decisions. | amendment makes it to the Senate |
The House of Representatives | floor as a standalone bill. |
recently voted to approve the | SOX also established the |
Garrett-Adler amendment, which | PCAOB to oversee and regulate |
would exempt small companies | audit firms. PCAOB operates under |
from SOX Section 404 provisions, | the supervision of the Securities |
while the Supreme Court is considering | and Exchange Commission (SEC), |
the constitutionality of the | which also appoints PCAOB members. |
Public Company Accounting Oversight | It is funded by fees charged to |
Board (PCAOB). | audited firms. When it was established, |
These developments may have | Congress wanted the board |
long-term implications for SOX, the | to be separate, with its own funding |
2002 legislation passed in the wake | stream, and outside normal civil |
of the Enron, WorldCom, and Tyco | service laws so it could attract |
scandals. The outcomes may also | highly qualified specialists. PCAOB |
have implications for records managers, | membersâ salaries are more than |
information technology specialists, | $500,000 and are reviewed by the |
and compliance officers | SEC. |
who devise and implement company | Pro-business advocates, represented |
controls. | by the Free Enterprise |
Section 404 of SOX requires | Fund, argue that the PCAOBâs governance |
company auditors to attest to the | structure is unconstitutional |
soundness of the firmâs internal | because it is an independent |
controls and financial statements. | agency that does not allow for the |
Internal controls may include anything | president to appoint members. Additionally, |
from transaction approval authorizations | because only the president |
to records retention | can remove SEC commissioners |
programs. This provision is widely | for cause, and because |
blamed for an increase in auditorsâ | the SEC can only remove PCAOB |
fees, as well as increased expenditures | members for cause, some court |
to ensure that proper internal | members believe this is a formerly |
controls are in place. | unrecognized limit of the presidentâs |
Small firms â those with | powers that may contradict |
less than $75 million in | the constitution. |
market capitalization | The Supreme Court will take up |
â have protested that | the issue soon, and some legal experts |
compliance with SOX 404 would | believe that SOX could be |
cost them a disproportionate share | abolished completely if the court |
of their earnings. The complaint is | rules the PCAOB unconstitutional. |
supported by an independent study | |
conducted at Pennsylvania State | |
University, which showed that | |
firms just over the $75 million | |
mark paid nearly $700,000 more in | |
audit fees and had average earnings | |
of negative $1.4 million in 2004 |