Textbook Notes (363,474)
Canada (158,377)
York University (12,359)
Anthropology (304)
ANTH 1120 (45)

Jan 9:11- How has the transition from hunting and gathering to agriculture changed human settlement patterns, social organization, and nutritional status? .pdf

22 Pages
Unlock Document

York University
ANTH 1120
David Murray

9 January - 15 January MODULE III. PROGRESS AND DEVELOPMENT Jan 9/11: How has the transition from hunting and gathering to agriculture changed human settlement patterns, social organization, and nutritional status? Readings: 1) CA pp. 41-52 • P.41 - Chapter 2 The Meaning of Progress and Development • Problem 2: how do we explain the transformation of human societies over the past 10,000 years from small scale, nomadic bands of foragers to large scale urban industrial states? • P.42 • The third world is undergoing rapid ands sometimes chaotic social change: populations are growing and becoming more urbanized • Public health measures are lowering death rates • Modern technology has penetrated the third world and transformed production • Education at all levels is spreading • Introduction • Today no human beings anywhere in the world live exclusively by foraging, although every society in existence is descended from such people • Foragers (hunters and gatherers) are the common ancestors of us all • We have witnessed a nation divided into wealthy and poor • Why approximately 100,000 years ago, after thousands of years of living a foragers, some of these societies begin to abandon their way of life and begin to domesticate plants and animals and exchanged their nomadic existence for sedentary dwelling in villages • How did these villages get divided into rich and poor states • Moral predicament involves our perceptions of the few remaining small scale, tribal societies that exist in the world today • P.43 Many assume humans chose to abandon a nomadic , foreign life because they discovered • better ways of living • Do we assume that the few existing small scale tribal socities are remnants of an inferior way of life and that given the opportunity their members will chose to adopt modern farming, wage labour or urban life? • Explain wealthy vs not as progressed vs not? • Progress: the idea that whims of nature to a life of control and domination over natural forces • Culture change • Until approximately 10,000 years ago earths inhabitants were scatted in small scale nomadic bands of 30 to 100 people who lived by gathering wild plants and hunting small and large game (search needs mobility so moved every couple days) • No formal leaders and little occupational specialization (if was, delt with medicine) • Kinship served as the main organizing principle of these societies and social differences among people were based largely on age and gender • Because there was little occupational specialization and little difference in individual wealth or possessions, relations among persons likely were of an egalitarian nature Some point in history 200-2000 people began settling and planting crops and • domesticating wild animals • They practiced slash-and-burn or swidden agriculture, they cleared forests by burning the trees and brush and planted crops among the ashes of the cleared ground • The land would be cultivated from 1-3 yrs then another plot of land would be burned and planted • Villages consisted of textured family groups and people organized themselves in clans: groups of 200-500 people who claimed descent from a common ancestor • Settlements combined under common leaders to affirm states consisting of many thousands of persons • The development of agriculture intensified, and slash and burn techniques were replaced by plow or irrigation agriculture • Leaders organized labour for the purpose of constructing public works--roads, defensive fortifications or religious structures, such as pyramid or churches. • P.44 • Competition between groups over available resources contributed to the development of standing armies; hereditary leaders emerged; settlements grew into cities • Technological complexity increased, people began to develop specific skills and to specialize in occupational tasks and occupational specialization led to increased trade and the evolution of a class of merchants • One simple explanation for the transformation of societies from nomadic bands to industrial states is that human inventions created better ways of doing things, in other words human culture progressed. • P.45 • Way of life of foragers is superior to that of group maintained by sedentary agriculture • Slash and burn agriculture was more efficient and less wasteful that modern methods of food production • Question 2.1 : Why did Foraging Societies Switch to Sedentary Agriculture? • The simplest explanation of why foragers chose at some point to settle down and domesticate plants and animals is that sedimentary agriculture was an easier, less dangerous, and more productive way to get food ( progression --can make food instead of searching for it) • Change occurs bc of a desire to progress • Morgan created a society which evolved through 3 stages the he labelled savagery, barbarism and civilization (then divided savagery and barbarism into early, middle and late stages & to go form one stage to another required major technological invention) • P.46 • The advance from early to middle savagery was marked by fire, from middle to late savagery by the invention of the bow and arrow; from late savagery hough late barbarism by the invention of pottery, agriculture and animal domestication until progression of civilization • Leslie White saw technology as the driving force of cultural evolution • White saw human beings seeking to harness energy through technology and to transform that energy into things that are required for survival, such as food , clothing, shelter----by means of technology, energy is put to work and the amount of food, clothing or other goods produced by the expenditure of energy will be proportional to the efficiency of the technology available • Foragers had limited muscle power so limited energy production by their work • Technological advances such as the plow, the water wheel and the windmill enabled people to grow more crop and domesticate animals, they became able to transform more and more energy to their use Later, the new forms of energy in the form of coal, oil, and gas were harnessed by means • of steam engines and internal combustion engines, the amount of energy human beings could harness again leap forward • Cultural development, from White’s perspective, varies directly with the efficiency of the tools employed. • more efficient technology allows humans societies to transform more energy to fill their needs, and the societies then can produce more food and support larger populations • Efficiency and food production allowed a few people to produce enough food for everyone, freezing others to develop other skills and thereby promoting occupational specialization • Specialization produced widespread trade and load to the development of commerce • Increasing population, with increase contact between groups, require the development of it’s the state to coordinate group activities and organize armies to protect growing wealth of its members from other groups. • White’s view of technology as the driving force of cultural evolution was highly influential in the 20th century. His theories represent the colons to the point of view that is prevalent among many people • today: the opinion that technology is the true measure of progress, the more energy human societies can harness the development of new power sources, more social, economic, and political problems that will solve. • Page 47 • Many people view application of technology for the solutions continuing world problems. • When are the first supposition about life and forging societies to be challenged how to do with the roles of males and females. • Studies found that the gathering activities of woman produced by far the greater share of food in the societies; men hunted, but, except in areas such as the Arctic and subarctic regions, meat and fish consisted only about one quarter of the diet. • The second supposition -the foragers often when hungry-prove to be unfounded.-Plenty of food.-Did not have to work very hard to get it. • Life Among Foragers: The Hadza and Ju/‘hoansi • Studied by James Woodburn 1960s, Hadza were a small group of nomadic foragers in Tanzania. • Barren land, desert. Living on the verge of starvation. Rich in food and resources. Many wild animals elephants, giraffes, zebras, gazelle • Plant foods they send roots, berries, and fruit-abundant for 80% of culture. • Woman responsible for almost all plant food gathering, hunting exclusively a male activity. ( men hunted with spears and poisoned arrow-no guns, spears, or traps] • Consider meat only as proper food. • Plant food was plentiful but no attempt to preserve it. • Hadza better off than agricultural neighbours in terms of health. • Ju’/hosani people of the Kalahari desert, and Namibia Africa. • Foraging society that has contributed extensively to what anthropologists learn about small-scale societies. • Lorna marshall with children, also Richard lee researched this culture in 1950s • P.48 • Lived around waterholes, from which they would wander as far as 6 miles in search of plants and animals. • Their groups numbers from 30 to 40 people during rainy season when waterholes were full and plentiful and increased to 100 to 200 during the dry season when only the larger holes retained water. • Lee found the food quest was constant in Ju/‘hoansi like Hadza • Ju/‘hoansi Did little food processing, had to get food supplies every third or fourth day. • Vegetables constituted 60 to 40% of diet, woman gathered most of it, previous in 2 to 3 times as much food as men. • Never exhausted their food supply. • Major food source was Mongonogo nuts, more nourishing then our own breakfast cereals, contain five times the calories, 10 times the protein Monogongo provide 50% ofJu/‘hoansi caloric intake • • Territory containing more than 80 other species of edible plants, most of which they didn’t even use, though they did eat about 20 species of roots, melons, gums, bulbs, and dried fruit. • Meat was provided by and occasional giraffe, antelope, or other large game -- meat intake was between 175 and 200 pounds per person per year. • Environment provided ample available food If lacking anything, carbohydrates no bread pasta rice or sugar • • Individual average to 2.3 days at this work (gathering food), with a typical working day of six hours. • Overall the average time spent getting food was 2.4 days, or less than 20 hours of work per week. • Other time was spent doing housework or fixing tools • Page 49 • Lee concludes that, contrary to the stereotype that foragers my struggle with limited technology to obtain the food they need for survival, they do not have to work very hard to make a living. • Foraging society struggle for existence is an ethnocentric notion that assumes that our own technologically oriented society represents the pinnacle of development. • The Transition to Agriculture • Perspective on cultural evolution that muse change from foraging to modern, industrial society lessons development or progress I’m more of a necessary evil. • Perspective emphasizes the influences of population growth in population density [the number of people living in a given area]. • Examine the transition from foraging to agriculture, exploring reasons for the eventful change from relatively simple-and-burn agriculture to more complex labor-intensive irrigation agriculture. • Mark cohen explain why individuals or groups abandoned foraging for agriculture why so many did in a relatively short period of time • First examined reported food gathering strategies of forging societies • . Forger settle in given areas to collect food, food readers in the current one spot, enlarge area within which they travel in search of them. • Cohen suggests that when population density and given geographical area reached the point where different groups began to bump into each other, or when groups found they had to travel farther and farther to get enough food to feed a growing population , they began to cultivate their own crops Historical transition from foraging too simple agriculture was a necessary consequence of • population growth, rather than a consequence of the discovery or invention that was adopted because it made life better. • Cohen argued that agriculture didn’t make life better at all and made life worse. • Most parts of the world societies abandoned foraging--began to utilize slash and burn agriculture techniques • Slash and burn agriculture can you practice by relatively small kinship-based groups. Form of growing crops, highly efficient and productive. • • Kookier, ihabit tropical rainforest of Brazil produce about 2,000,000 cal per acre of land farmed, feed two people for a year--work only about two hours today. • Page 50 • Slash and burn --population and amount of land needed to feed both increase, plots must be used more frequently [When land is cultivated more frequently, the yield per acre declines] Slash and burn agriculture is efficient only as long as the population in the amount of land • available constant • Farmland becomes scars not only because of increasing population but because of environmental changes. • The more food the group needs to produce, the more complex the technology needed to produce it; and the more complex technologies, the greater the amount of work involved. • Page 51 Not enough land to support slash and burn agriculture • • History of humankind, in fact been marked by increasing population and increasing the ratio of people to land • Robert careener - increase in the number of people relative to the available land creates two problems • First, if there are more people than there is available land to feed them, conflict may arise between people versus the available food resources. • Second, a growing population decides to identify methods of growing crops, there is a need for greater societal organization. • Whether a society deals with an increasing ratio between land and people by intensifying efforts to produce more food, or it addresses the problem by denying some people access to the necessary resources, the groundwork is laid for the emergence of a stratified society and then you push the organization. • Page 52 • Views of cohen and Carnerio suggests that the historical changes societies from foraging to gradually more labor-intensive methods of agriculture was not a matter of choice, slash and burn agriculture wasn’t easier than foraging & plowing and irrigation agriculture was a more efficient to slash and burn agriculture. • Instead, the changes and food production techniques represented necessities brought about by population increase my increase in population density, and he created the need for more formal, more elaborate clinical social institution, both organize labor and to maintain order among more and more people. • United States only 1 cal of human energy is needed to produce 210 cal for human consumption, well foragers produce fewer than 10 cal of food every calorie that he’s collecting. • You vastly decreased the amount of human labor required to produce food and increase the amount of nonhuman energy required for food production. 2) Goodman, Alan H. and George J. Armelagos. 2000. “Disease and Death at Dr. Dickson’s Mounds.” In Nutritional Anthropology. Alan .H. Goodman, Darna L. Darfour and Gretel H. Pelto, eds. Mountainview, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company: 58-62. • P.58 - Disease and Death at Dr. Dickson’s Mounds • West Illinois are 12-13 poorly defined earth mounds and were built to burry their dead Late 1920s don dickson, a chiropractor undertook the first systematic excavation of the • mounds, located on farmland owned by his father • Dickson became so involved in undertaking of unearthing skeletons and trying to dinginess the maladies of long dead individuals • He then became concerned with the patterns of disease and death in this extinct group in order to understand how these people lived and why they died at an early age • A.D. 950 hunter gathers lived along the Illinois river valley area near Dickson, subsisting on a wide range of local plants and animals, including grasses and seeds, fruits and barries, roots and tubers, vines, herbs, large and small mammals, migratory waterfowl and riverine birds and fins • The population density as ow, perhaps on the order of two or three persons per square mile • By 1200 the population density increased by a factor of ten, to about 25 persons per square mile • Largest settlement in the area, Larson, was a residential ceremonial centre where some 1000 inhabitants lived Trade flourished,networking of mize growing, mound building societies that spread • throughout most of the east US • Many of the goods came from Cahokia with more than 120 mounds within a six square mile area (30,000 persons lived there) • British archeologists believed that the development of agriculture promted et first great revolution in human technology, ushering in fundamental changes in economy, social organizations, and ideology Some believe increased population pressure, leading to food shortages and • deckling health, spurred ths witch to agricultural food production • Others believe population increase was one of the consequences of agricultural revolutions • More important the effects of the agricultural revolution on the health of people who lived at the time of such change • P.59 • Three circumstances have made it possible to test the effects agriculture has had upon health at Dickson First,hose working with him valued the potential information to be gained from • skeletons and therefore paid close attention to their extinction • Second, the recovered reminds included both individuals who lived before the development of maize agriculture--two groups of individuals could be distinguished according to mounds they were buried and position • Third, enabling condition was provided by janice cohen--her analysis of highly heritable dental traits showed that although Dickson was in contact with persons from outside the central Illinois river valley area during the period of cultural change, groups did not replace or significantly merge with the local groups John lallo set out to test whether health at dickson improved, got worse, or • remained the same with the advent of agriculture and its accompanying changes • Lallo argued that intensification of maize agriculture most likely resulted in a poorer diet bc heavy reliance on only 1 crop • Increased population density, a more sedentary life style and greater trade, all of which are associated with agriculture, provide conditions for the spread and maintenance of infectious diseases • The skeletons of individuals who lived before and after the introduction of maize agriculture were examined for a number of different health indicators in order to provide a balanced picture of the patterns of stress, disease and death that affected the Dickson population • The indicators that proved most sensitive to health differences were: bone lesions (scars) due to infection, nutritional def
More Less

Related notes for ANTH 1120

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.