MODR 1770 Chapter Notes - Chapter 6: D.C. Sniper Attacks, Eugenius Warming, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College

70 views4 pages

bronzeskunk501

23 Jan 2017

School

Department

Course

Professor

For unlimited access to Textbook Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

Hasty generalization: in a hasty generalization one concludes from a small or unrepresentative sample to a larger population. False cause: in a false cause fallacy, the arguer suggests that because two things are found together (are correlated), then one must cause the other. Slippery slope: catastrophic outcome, step by step that are sequentially connected. Red herring: when two different topics are being mentioned, changing the topic completely. Ad hominem (both circumstantial and abusive): language designed to insult you. Poisoning the well: (cid:449)he(cid:374) (cid:455)ou dis(cid:272)(cid:396)edit so(cid:373)eo(cid:374)e(cid:859)s a(cid:396)gu(cid:373)e(cid:374)t (cid:271)efo(cid:396)e the(cid:455) gi(cid:448)e. atta(cid:272)k o(cid:374) the person, designed so you are going to dismiss anything they say before you say it. The(cid:396)e (cid:449)ill (cid:271)e a (cid:395)uestio(cid:374) that does(cid:374)(cid:859)t ha(cid:448)e a falla(cid:272)(cid:455) Explain why the passage has the fallacy you diagnosed (2-3 sentences) Do(cid:374)(cid:859)t (cid:374)eed to k(cid:374)o(cid:449) a(cid:271)out (cid:374)eut(cid:396)alizi(cid:374)g falla(cid:272)(cid:455) There will be 15 questions (a few sentences for each) When you assume what, the person is set out to prove.

Related Questions

A statement that is necessarily false, or a group of statements that, taken together, are inconsistent. A) Division B) Suppression C) Questionable Cause D) Contradiction 2. An attack on oneâs opponent rather than oneâs opponentâs argument. A) Faulty Comparison B) Categorical Proposition C) False Dilemma D) Ad Hominem Argument 3. Consciously believing at a deeper level what we know to be dubious. A) Mood B) Conclusion C) Self-Deception D) Irrelevant Reason 4. A limited perspective shaped by the ideas, interests, and kinds of behavior favored by the groups with which we identify. A) Provincialism B) Delusional C) Composition D) Tokenism 5. Drawing conclusions about a population on the basis of a sample that is too small to be a reliable measure of that population. A) Minor Term B) Small Sample C) Suppressed Evidence D) Rationalization 6. Is the following argument valid or invalid? If valid, explain whether it is deductive or inductive. If invalid, explain why: âMr. Michaels believes that he is the only person on the ballot capable of running our town. He says so time and again in his campaign speeches and ads. What he fails to mention is that he is an alcoholic womanizer with no scruples. Who in their right mind could vote for that?â HTML Editor 7. The fallacy in which it is assumed parts of an item have a particular property because the item as a whole has that property. A) Premise B) Indirect Proof C) Division D) Unrepresentative Sample 8. The fallacious drawing of a conclusion from relevant but insufficient evidence. A) Appeal to Authority B) Hasty Conclusion C) Loyalty D) Middle Term 9. Valid reasoning from justified (warranted) premises that include all likely relevant information. A) Guilt by Association B) Indirect Proof C) Cogent Reasoning D) Contradiction 10. A comparison of one thing to another based on a perceived similarity. A) Indirect Proof B) Analogy C) Two Wrongs Make a Right D) Questionable Cause 11. Is the following argument valid or invalid? If valid, explain whether it is deductive or inductive. If invalid, explain why: âMrs. Kelvin has accused me of intentionally denting her rear fender. I neither confirm nor deny this, however in telling her story she leaves out an important point. As we were both leaving our driveways that morning, I backed onto the street first. She saw this and then deliberately pulled in front of my vehicle as I was preparing to continue down the street. Mrs. Kelvin intended to cut me off, so what happened to her car was entirely her fault.â HTML Editor 12. Is the following argument valid or invalid? If valid, explain whether it is deductive or inductive. If invalid, explain why: âAfter careful consideration, it is the determination of the board that free soda will no longer be provided in the break room. Before making this decision, a survey was distributed amongst all members of the upper management to determine their opinion on the matter. Based on the majority of responses, it was evident that withdrawing the free soda will not have any significant negative effect on morale.â HTML Editor 13. Use of a term in a passage to mean one thing in one place and something else in another. A) Cogent Reasoning B) Superstition C) Equivocation D) Inconsistent

MODR 1770 Chapter Notes - Chapter 6: D.C. Sniper Attacks, Eugenius Warming, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College

Document Summary

Get access

Related Documents

MODR 1770 Lecture Notes - Ad Hominem, Genetic Fallacy, Straw Man

MODR 1770 Lecture Notes - Argument From Analogy, Epithet, Theocracy

MODR 1770 Lecture Notes - Profit Margin, Argument From Analogy, Syntactic Ambiguity

Related Questions