Textbook Notes (368,844)
Canada (162,200)
York University (12,874)
Psychology (3,584)
PSYC 3420 (57)
Chapter 9

Chapter 9 evolutionary psychology.doc

7 Pages
108 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC 3420
Professor
Irwin Silverman
Semester
Winter

Description
Chapter 9 evolutionary psychology • Problems of group living: • Cooperative alliances: • Evolution of cooperation: o The problem of altruism:  Some is due to inclusive fitness, but not your friends  Any cost is a loss to you  Social exchange occurs across cultures resembling evolving human histories  Even species far moved from humans display this-vampire bats  Primates use reciprocal exchanges • Theory of reciprocal altruism:  Adaptations for friends can evolve as long as it is reciprocated in future  Psych mechanisms and reciprocal altruism outlive ppl who don’t use these r.s.  Ensuring benefits reciprocated –problem of cheating— o Tit for tat:  Prisoners dilemma-rat on(police incentive) or both go free(no evidence)  Most rational choice would be to both confess; worst outcome…  Cooperation b.w. Two mates would be best for both  Each can gain from coop, but tempted by police, worst is defects…  Tit for tat-200 round of prisoner’s dilemma; points…  Coop first, reciprocate thereafter  1.never be first to rat out defect; 2. Retaliate only after defect 3. Be forgiving if cooperating • Box 9.1 strategies for promoting cooperation: o Axelrod-enlarge shadow of future-frequent interactions for reciprocity Opportunities o Teach reciprocity-oneself becomes more cooperative; more coop ppl less benefit in being a rat o Insist on no more than equity-greed bad; coop better o Respond quickly to provocation-retaliate immediately and strongly o Cultivate personal rep as reciprocator- shows others, helps all • Cooperation among nonhumans: o Food sharing in vampire bats:  Blood source of food; ales leave when independent; nocturnal  Ability to get blood increases in age/experience; 33% under s yrs. Failed on a certain night, while 7% of older failed to feed  3 days to die w/o blood; regurgitate to give others; have friends who reciprocate;  More association, more likely to share; 60% of the time around= received from compatriot; if not around often=no sharing  Friends regurgitated more when their friends were in dire need and close to starvation 1  Starved bats who received help from friends more likely to give those ones help in need= altruism o Chimpanzee politics:  Dominance of big heavy chimp, to sexual activity; 75% mating responsibility  Ne kid on the block takes over, show off and bluff threats=women stayed with other chimp first; using the peacemakers of men/women alliances strong  Women began to move, dethroned, jump in copulations 25%-50%; older guys sex access dropped to 0  Old chimp made alliance with new up comer, who fought and caused 50% to him and 25% to old chimp. • Cooperation’s and altruism among humans: o Social contract theory:  Vulnerable to cheating; but sometimes favors cant be repaid on the spot  Social contract theory- evolution to solve cheating to the threat of cooperation which is necessary • Would favor them b.c. No cost incurs! • So, reciprocal altruism can only evolve if they have mechanism to detect cheaters… • 1. Ability to recognize many diff individual humans o Recognition vs. Sea of others; 34 yrs. Even w/o seeing o Neurological evidence in right hemisphere • 2. Ability to remember histories and interaction with many others o Remember them, and label them coop/cheater o Keep track of who owes whom • 3. Ability to communicate ones values o Communicate distress, or else vulnerable to be cheated again • 4. Ability to model values of others o Detect when a person needs; how they are needy; how to tailor fit help • 5. Ability to represent costs and benefits o Mechanisms of social exchange and cognitive pricing vs. Benefit o General ability to represent costs in exchanges not specific to items, which has evolved o Evidence for cheater-detections adaptations:  Humans aren’t all too logical  No evolved mechanism to respond to abstract logic problems  Do well looking for cheaters though  75% correct on a test for cheater detection, cross cultures, possible universal adaption of social exchange 2  Patient R.M did ok on some social exchange reasoning and may have more cognitive machinery even with a brain deformity  Mechanism appears to be highly sensitive to perspective one adopts • Governs sort of cheaters one biasedly looks for o Do people remember cheaters:  Remember know cheaters, low status cheater better than cooperators  Remembered best when rare, , source memory for cheaters-cheating context  Face recognition good for nonaltruists; avoid interaction with these others  Automatic bias toward ppl who has not cooperated; subtle visual cues perhaps; priming a personal story of cheating enhances recognition o Detection of prospective altruists:  Selection will favor coevolved adaptations to avoid being detected as cheaters  Adaptations lead to subtle forms of cheating; adaptations to sense genuineness of altruism  Those who help w/o seeking a return are genuine=best\  Altruism detection tasks success predicts performance on abstract problems • This would favor selection • However cheater detection/ altruism detection are very separate  Genuine spontaneous smiles in a study showed genuine altruism cues o Indirect reciprocity theory:  Altruism can evolve in indirect reciprocity-reputation, gossip..  Attractive to third parties, not direct, especially generous when others watching o Costly signaling theory:  Altruism in gifts to signal alliance reliability  Good for ppl with resources; costly=coalition-like-candidate  Honest cue to gauge resources and alliances  Forms of signals: 1. Preferentially chosen by others for coop relationships 2. Increased levels of coop within those r.s. 3. Higher status and reputation which could lead to a host of mates and other benefits  Test: volunteer anonymous or in group setting: • Anonymous was least taxing; group was most taxing • Forms to evolve by gaining reputation(more altruism in group)  Hang out with each other, altruists attract others, and each other o Psychology of Friendship: • Friendship; pleasure when helping-without receiving a reward • When we get a reciprocity guarantee we interpret it as less friendly • Marital reciprocation is likely dissatisfaction\ 3 • Should attend to intuitions, they have a signal that friendships in fact aren’t tit for tat  Should altruism be defined according to cost incurred: • Not considered to have occurred unless individual who is the altruist incurs a cost •
More Less

Related notes for PSYC 3420

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit