Textbook Notes (368,720)
United States (206,099)
PS 101 (13)
All (13)
Chapter 13

Intro to US Gov & Pol [COMPLETE NOTES] Chapter 13 -- I 4.0ed this course

8 Pages
120 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
PS 101
Professor
All Professors
Semester
Fall

Description
PS 101 Chapter 13 Notes-The Courts I. Textbook o JudiciaryAct of 1789: The law in which Congress laid out the organization of the federal judiciary. The law refined and classified federal court jurisdiction and set the original number of justices at 6. It also created the Office of the Attorney General and established the lower federal courts. o District courts: Lower-level trail courts of the federal judicial system that handles most U.S federal cases. o Appellate jurisdiction: The authority of a court to hear appeals from lower courts and change or uphold the decision. o Judicial review: The Supreme Court’s power to strike down a law or executive branch action that it finds unconstitutional. o Writs of mandamus: Order issued by a higher court to a lower court, government official, or government agency to perform acts required by law. o Constitutional Interpretation: The process of determining whether a piece of legislation of governmental action is supported by the Constitution. o Statutory Interpretation: The various methods and tests used by the courts for determining and meaning of a law and applying it to specific situations. Congress may overturn the courts’interpretation by writing a new law; thus it also engages in statutory interpretation. o Plaintiff: The person or party who brings a case to court o Defendant: The person or party against whom a case is brought o Verdict: The final decision in a court case o Plea Bargain:An agreement between a plaintiff and defendant to settle a case before it goes to trial or the verdict is decided. In a civil case this usually involves an admission of guilt in return for a reduced charge or sentence. o Standard of proof: The amount of evidence needed to determine the outcome of a case. The standard is higher in a criminal case than in a civil one. o Burden of proof: The responsibility of having to prove guilt; it rests with the plaintiff in criminal cases but could be with either party in a civil trial. o Class action lawsuit:Acase brought by a group of individuals on behalf of themselves and others in the general public who are in similar circumstances. o Adversarial System:Atwo-sided court structure in which lawyers on both sides of a case attempt to prove their argument over their opponent’s version of the case o Common Law: Law based on the precedent of previous court rulings rather than on legislation. It is used in all federal courts and forty nine of the fifty state courts. o Precedent:Alegal norm established in court cases that is in then applied to future cases dealing with the same legal questions o Standing: Legitimate justification for bringing a civil case to court o Senatorial Courtesy: Anorm in the nomination of district court judges in which the president consults with his party’s senators from the relevant state in choosing the nominee. o Docket: The official schedule of cases in a court of law o Original Jurisdiction: The authority of a court to handle a case first, as in the Supreme Court’s authority to initially hear disputes between two states. However, original jurisdiction for the Supreme Court is not exclusive; it may assign such a case to a lower court. o Cases appeal: Cases brought before the Supreme Court because Congress has determined that they require the Court’s attention. o Writ of Certification:An uncommon way in which a case is brought before the Supreme Court, whereby an appeals court asks the Court for instructions on a point of law never before decided. o Writ of Certiorari: The most common way for a case to reach the Supreme Court, in which at least four of the nine judges agree to hears a case that has reached them via an appeal from the losing party in a lower court’s ruling. o Collusion:Agreement between the litigants on the desired outcome of a case, causing a federal court to decline to hear the case. More generally, collusion can refer to any kind of conspiracy or complicity. o Mootness: The irrelevance of a case by the time it is received by a federal court, causing the court to decline to hear the case. o Ripeness:Acriterion that federal courts use to decide whether a case is ready to be heard. Acase’s ripeness is based on whether its central issue or controversy has actually taken place. o Cert pool:Asystem initiated in the Supreme Court in the 1970s in which law clerks screen cases that come to the Supreme Court and recommended to the justices which cases should be heard. o Solicitor General:Apresidential appointee in the Department of Justice who conducts all litigation on behalf of the federal government before the Supreme Court and supervises litigation in the federal appellate courts. o Briefs: Written documents prepared by both parties in a case, and sometimes by outside groups, presenting their arguments in court. o Amicus Curaie: Latin for “friend of the court,” referring to an interested group or person who shapes relevant information about a case to help the Court reach a decision o OralArguments: Spoken presentations made in person by the lawyers of each party to a judge or appellate court outlining the legal reasons why their side prevail. o Strict Construction:Away of interpreting the Constitution based on its language alone o Original Intent: The theory that justices should surmise the intention of the Founders when the language of the Constitution is unclear. o Living Constitution:Away of interpreting the Constitution that takes into account evolving national attitudes and circumstances rather than the text alone. o AttitudialistApproach:Away of understanding decisions of the Supreme Court based on the political ideologies of the justices. o Judicial Restraint: The idea that the Supreme Court should defer to the democratically elected executive and legislative branches of government rather than contradicting existing laws. o Judicial activism: The idea that the Supreme Court should assert its interpretation of the law even if it overrules the elected executive and legislative branches of government. o II. Lecture-The Judicial System A. Constitutional Foundations 1. Constitution established “one Supreme Court,” but left it up to Congress to decide how the judiciary would be structured 2. JudiciaryAct of 1789 set up a system of federal courts that were independent of state courts, but coexisted with them 3. Supreme Court did not have a lot of power B. What Changed? 1. Power of judicial review led to an increase in the power of the Supreme Court th 2. Established under the 4 Chief Justice (John Marshall) by decision in Marbury vs. Madison C. Marbury v. Madison 1. In the closing days of his presidency, JohnAdams makes a bunch of appointments 2. Thomas Jefferson comes to office and feels no compunction to honor these 3. Marbury and others fight back--invoke a law that says that the SC can issue orders against gov't officials 4. Marshall says this law conflicted withArticle III of the Constitution, so the original law could not stand D. Effects of the Decision? 1. Supreme Court became an institution on par with Congress and the President 2. Established that judiciary would serve as an important check on other branches a. Compatibility with democratic principles? 3. Gave Supreme Court final word on the Constitution E. US Court System 1. State courts a. Every state has its own court system and each is structured differently b. State and federal courts coexist and we all fall under the jurisdiction of both c. Nearly all legal disputes are handled at the state level 2. Federal courts a. Highest level— The Supreme Court b. Middle level—U.S Courts ofAppeals c. Lowest level—U.S District Courts F. Structure of U.S. Courts 1. Types of Cases/Offenses a. Criminal 1. Aviolation of public order or a wrong committed against the whole community 2. Punishable by imprisonment, fines, service, and death b. Civil 1. Disputed claims to something of value or wrongs committed by one person against another, but which do not harm the community as a whole 2. Divorce, contracts, slander, accidents, etc. 3. Punishable by paying for damages G. Civil Cases 1. Plaintiff makes a complaint 2. Both sides hire attorneys who make their arguments 3. The court decides 4. Standard of proof “preponderance of evidence” H. Criminal Cases 1. Police report investigation to prosecutor 2. Prosecutor goes before grand jury to present evidence and convince that enough exists to make an indictment 3. Government(represented by prosecutor) is the plaintiff, accused is the
More Less

Related notes for PS 101

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit