PHIL1004 Lecture Notes - Lecture 3: Intelligent Designer

46 views2 pages
26 May 2018
School
Department
Course
L5 3.1 ESSAY TIPS
- Wod Cout: Biliogaph, foot otes ad edotes do’t out toads od
count.
- Word Count Penalties: Penalties applied after by the 10% extra.
- Argue from your own point of view.
- Main Aim: to present an argument, aimed to persuade the reader to accept some
conclusion, by giving reasons.
- Refeeig. Does’t atte. Need aes ad ea ad page ue.
Grading:
- Presentation
- Content
- Argumentation
- Careful reading of text
- Creative philosophical response.
Basic Structure
1. Introduction (telling the reader what you will do. Keep brief. Use of first person is
okay. Final sentence must tell reader what you will argue) e.g. I will consider some
objections and I will do this. You can have a qualify conclusion. Write the
Introduction last.
2. Explanation
- <50%. No more than 500. Explain enough to get the argument going. Use your own
words to explain the philosophers argument. Don’t uote lectue slides!
- Use itatios. “Aodig to Auias … (your words) For instance, he writes (quote).
What he means by this is (your explanation). This seems right to me because (your
response). Same for secondary reference it is  that … This sees to e
supported by Z when she writes (secondary reference). According to Z (secondary
reference). This seems right to me because ..
- You have to give the paragraph no. for a website.
- Be selective with the use of quotes. Prioritise the primary reading.
3. Objections
- Explain the objections.
- Give reasons why someone might consider
4. Possible Replies
- Consider how the philosophers might respond.
5. Your Evaluation (endorse/rebut)
- Give clear reasons why the reader should accept o reject that reply in terms that
support your conclusion.
6. Conclusion (not the place to finally state your opinon)
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows half of the first page of the document.
Unlock all 2 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Wo(cid:396)d cou(cid:374)t: bi(cid:271)liog(cid:396)aph(cid:455), foot (cid:374)otes a(cid:374)d e(cid:374)d(cid:374)otes do(cid:374)"t (cid:272)ou(cid:374)t to(cid:449)a(cid:396)ds (cid:449)o(cid:396)d count. Word count penalties: penalties applied after by the 10% extra. Argue from your own point of view. Main aim: to present an argument, aimed to persuade the reader to accept some conclusion, by giving reasons. Basic structure: introduction (telling the reader what you will do. Final sentence must tell reader what you will argue) e. g. i will consider some objections and i will do this. Use your own words to explain the philosophers argument. Use (cid:272)itatio(cid:374)s. a(cid:272)(cid:272)o(cid:396)di(cid:374)g to a(cid:395)ui(cid:374)as (your words) for instance, he writes (quote). What he means by this is (your explanation). This seems right to me because (your response). Same for secondary reference it is (cid:373)(cid:455) that this see(cid:373)s to (cid:271)e supported by z when she writes (secondary reference). You have to give the paragraph no. for a website. Be selective with the use of quotes. Give reasons why someone might consider: possible replies.

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents