BTC1110 Lecture Notes - Lecture 11: Corporations Act 2001, Legal Personality, Apparent Authority

43 views11 pages
1
LAW OF BUSINESS ORGANISATIONS
Idea: the company is a separate artificial legal entity, independent of management and owners
(shareholders) and with no tangible form
Shareholders provide capital but are not involved in management and, most importantly, have
limited risk
Organisations varies in size
Typically created under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and ASIC Act 2001 (Cth) (ASIC is the
national regulator).
Features of a Company
A separate legal person
S124: a company has the legal capacity and powers of an individual
A company is separate from its owners (shareholders) and its managers (CEO and
directors)
A company's obligations (debts) are its own
A company's owners generally enjoy limited liability (not liable for debts of
company)
A company's managers are also not personally liable for the company's debts or
obligations
A company's property is its own, not managers nor owners
A company can sue and be sued in its own name
A company can commit a crime/tort or other wrongful conduct
It has perpetual succession (unlike p'ship), company still continues to exist despite
situations like an owner's death
Formation of a Company
Administration - responsibility of ASIC (p464)
Registration - through ASIC
To register a company, a person must lodge an application with ASIC and pay the
required fees (Corporations Act s117)
Types of Companies (p467)
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 11 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
2
Nature of a Company
'the corporate personality' (CA s124)
The recognition that a company is a separate legal entity is the the foundation of modern
corporations
Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd (p465)
Aaron S was sole proprietor of a successful business
Had a wife and several children
Four sons worked with him and wanted to be partners in business
A turned the business into a limited company with the required seven shareholders
(wife and 5 children) - two eldest became directors
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 11 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
3
Shortly after company was floated, business was badly affected by strikes and severe
downturn in the market for their products.
A leant additional money to save company but company failed
Unsecured creditors (employees/creditors) argued that A and his company were in
essence the same person and that he should actually be liable for the debts of company
Issue? How do we view the relationship between Salomon and the Co?
Court held:
whole transaction was against the true intent of the CA (stipulated a company
must have seven active and independent members), that the company was a
'sham' and that A had committed a fraud by overvaluing the company
it looks like a fraud given that S got 20,000 shares and each of the other 6
shareholders got 1 share each
Decided A was personally liable for the debts
House of Lords reversed decision:
Said Act required seven members but said nothing about it being independent or
active
No fraud
Therefore, as company was properly incorporated and there was no fraud in the
valuation of the company, there was no basis for holding A personally liable
Case confirmed that the separate legal personality principle even applied even
where the company is in reality a one-man band
Owner of business can as a result, use the separate corporate personality to shield
himself from liability
An application of Salomon
A company is separate from its owner
o Lee v Lee’s Air Farig:
Facts: L owned 2999 of the 3000 shares and was the CEO. He died while
aeial spaig ad ife laied okes opesatio. But this ould ol
e paid to a eploee. Could L e a eploee of a oe-a opa
for the purposes of work care?
Held: A oe as L as a e a eploee of the company. The rule
in Salomon meant that Lee could be employed by the company he owned
because the corporation and L were separate entities. Therefore L, as
director (an agent of the company), entered into a contract with L, in his
personal capacity.
Constitutions and replaceable rules
469-70
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 11 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Idea: the company is a separate artificial legal entity, independent of management and owners (shareholders) and with no tangible form. Shareholders provide capital but are not involved in management and, most importantly, have limited risk: organisations varies in size, typically created under the corporations act 2001 (cth) and asic act 2001 (cth) (asic is the national regulator). Features of a company: a separate legal person. It has perpetual succession (unlike p"ship), company still continues to exist despite situations like an owner"s death. Formation of a company: administration - responsibility of asic (p464, registration - through asic, to register a company, a person must lodge an application with asic and pay the required fees (corporations act s117, types of companies (p467) "the corporate personality" (ca s124: the recognition that a company is a separate legal entity is the the foundation of modern corporations.

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents