Class Notes (835,926)
Canada (509,504)
Psychology (3,977)
PSYC 2650 (196)
Dan Meegan (73)
Lecture

PSYC2650 Lecture Notes 2.docx

10 Pages
120 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC 2650
Professor
Dan Meegan
Semester
Fall

Description
PSYC2650 Lecture Notes Oct. 9, 2012 - Long-term memory: Episodic – episodes of one’s life; encoding (how things get into long-term memory in first place), retrieval;; Semantic – storage - History: Herman Ebbinghaus “On Memory” (1885) during time when introspection used to understand mind - Before Ebbinghaus studied memory, most obvious way for people at time to study memory was to start with formed ideas and look backward to find source o Ebbinghaus studied how memory developed + was able to bring many variables under scientific control - Experimental control through: o To-be-remembered stimuli no prior experience with it, meaningless (no semantic associations), i.e. nonsense syllables (consonant-vowel-consonant, i.e. Kag) o Independent variables = retention interval (long = bad for memory, i.e. do all studying early and set it aside till exam), list length (# of nonsense syllables), extended practice (over- learning), serial order  Extended practice = after learning list until 2 perfect recitals, rehearsed list 30 more times  using 24hr RI, savings in relearning the over-learned list = 64% vs. 34% for normal learning  serial order = strength of association between adjacent items on list  direction of associations = forward and backward  i.e. (1) MEV, (2) GOR, (3) DUX forward = would presenting MEV evoke GOR?; backward = would presenting GOR evoke MEV?  Learned 3 lists of 8 stimuli, then relearned each list under different conditions: same order = 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 o Reversed order = 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o Random order = 5 2 6 8 1 3 7 4 o Does order affect relearning phase?  If forward associations exist, then savings on relearning same list would be > savings for random list o If backward associations exist, then savings on relearning reversed list would be > savings for random list  Savings expected: same = 33%, reversed = 12%, random = 0% o Conclusion = forward and backward associations exist, but forward are stronger o Dependent variables = retention savings o i.e. study list of nonsense syllables measure study time for 2 perfect recitations (measure of time, instead of memory accuracy) independent variable = retention interval (RI; range 20 min. – 31 days) relearn list after RI and re-measure study for time for 2 recitations  calculating retention savings: savings = (study time before RI – study time after RI)/study time before RI  should have proportion that captures how much less time it takes to study nd st 2 time than 1 time o have 64% savings from having exposure to items before captures how much memory you have  “forgetting function” retention of nonsense syllables measured by savings in relearning  retention decreases as retention interval (time between initial learning and retention line) increases, but rate of forgetting slows down - strengths of Ebbinghaus’ approach: meticulous selection of stimuli o defining relevant independent variables o innovative dependent measure to measure strength of memory traces - problems: some nonsense syllables may have meaning (i.e. dux = ducks) o Only used one subject (himself) representativeness? Expertise? Bias? - Contributions: encoding extended practice, list length o Storage forward and backward associations (storage based on order) o Retrieval retention interval Oct. 11, 2012 - Memory encoding: factors that affect whether something becomes stored in long-term memory inc. elaboration and intention Elaboration – quality (not just quantity) of practice is important for memory encoding (deep processing) o Involves embellishing a to-be-remembered item with additional info o Memory = interconnections of topics o i.e. remember simple sentences like “The doctor hated the lawyer”  2 study conditions: elaborative = generate elaboration “because of the malpractice suit”; control = just read and study sentence  Memory test = complete the sentence “the doctor hated ____”  Results = 72% recall @ elaborative, 57% recall @ control elaborative is better  Recall of elaboration might lead to recall of word when word could otherwise not be recalled (boost in elaborate condition) o Provides a somewhat “cued recall” (vs. free recall) - Levels of processing (Creek and Lock) Deep processing – meaningful; really think about material leads to better memory (vs. shallow processing) o i.e. task = read pairs of associated words 2 types of association = semantic (deep; i.e. tulip-flower) and rhymes (shallow; i.e. tower-flower)  results = 81% recall @ semantic, 70% recall @ rhymes o self-reference = kind, rigid, brave, selfish does this word have an “e”? (shallow) does this word describe you? (deep)  self-reference words that describe = almost perfect recall o intuition about intention (?) o i.e. subjects saw list of 24 words at 3 words/s 2 task conditions: deep = rate pleasantness of words; shallow = check for “e” or “g” in words  2 learning conditions: intentional = you will be given a memory test; incidental = naive about memory test (didn’t know about it)  Rate pleasantness = greater recall on memory test (almost no difference between intention/incidental)  intention did not matter, depth of processing matters o intention can have a positive effect on memory, effects often indirect when there is intention, there is more likely to be elaboration - long-term memory retrieval when fail to retrieve something possible that it has been lost/erased OR it’s “in there” somewhere but can’t retrieve it - memories forgotten but not lost i.e. subjects studied 20 #-noun pairs (i.e. 43-dog) to some criterion 2 wks later given memory test (43-__?) o able to recall 75% of items; remaining 25% used again 2 study conditions (study list once): unchanged = “43-dog” (cued recall); changed = “43-house”  2 memory test (immediately after study) = 78% recall at unchanged, 43% recall @ changed Recall – subjects asked to generate previously-studied items cued recall = i.e. paired associates, given pairs or sentences of info then given part of cue to recall rest o Generally harder than recognition  Not always recognition test = circle names recognized as person who was famous before 1950 (i.e. Doyle, Ferguson, Thomas)  Recall test = author of Sherlock Holmes stories, Sir Arthur Conan ___.  42% recall due to prior knowledge + sentence context (elaborative cue) o i.e. short answer test not always, could be application to multiple choice question(s) too Recognition – info presented and asked was test item a previously-studied item? (i.e. multiple choice test) - Factors that contribute to failures to retrieve info stored in long-term memory: Encoding-retrieval correspondence –retrieval in context similar to encoding = easier to retrieve  successful retrieval of info in long-term might be contingent upon correspondence between encoding and retrieval conditions Encoding-specificity principle – (same thing as correspondence) probability of recalling item at test depends on similarity of its encoding at test to its original encoding at study  i.e. phase 1 = learn pairs of words for memory test for 2 word (i.e. train- black, remember black) o phase 2 = generate 4 free-associates to words (i.e. given white and generate snow, black, wool, pure) o phase 3 = recognition test which of 4 free-associates was a to-be- remembered word from phase 1?  54% correct o phase 4 = cued-recall test (retrieval conditions look similar to encoding conditions) train-___?  61% correct o dissimilar in phase 1 and 3 = poor recognition; similar in phase 1 and 4 = good recall  memory better when test conditions match study condition  study and test environment (i.e. changing rooms, underwater vs. on shore)  emotional context of study and test (i.e. eye-witness testimony)  state of inebriation/intoxication at study and test Interference – other memories may interfere with retrieval of to-be-remembered info Proactive – when learning of new material is disrupted by previously-learned material Retroactive – when learning of new material disrupts memory for previously-learned material - Lab 4: Encoding specificity encoding = paired associates strong semantic association = wasp- sting; weak = cowboy-chair) o retrieval = encoding context old (same context as encoding): strong = wasp-STING; wake = cowboy-CHAIR  new (different context than encoding): strong = rocking-CHAIR or bee-STING; weak = river-STING or mug-CHAIR o predictions: recognition test = did you see word in CAPS earlier?  old > new  old/strong (wasp-STING) > new/strong (bee-STING)  old/weak (cowboy-CHAIR) > new/weak (mug-CHAIR)  old/weak (cowboy-CHAIR) > new/strong (rocking-CHAIR)  old context (faster recall/shorter response time)> strong association  intuition tells us intention and strong association would have a big effect not true, context has bigger effect Tip-of-the-tongue – have concept clearly in mind, but can’t come up with right word to describe it o another example of failed retrieval o (Brown & McNeil) read out dictionary definitions of rare words and asked subjects to identify words defined  i.e. navigational instruments used to determine positions of stars sextant  type of caving done on whale bone, often depicting whaling ships or whales scrimshaw  Russian sled drawn by 3 horses troika  If T-O-T, tried to guess initial letter, # of syllables, and what it sounds like 57% correct with initial letter (above chance)  Scrimshaw = something (sounds) like Sanskrit Oct. 16, 2012 - Semantic vs. episodic (some info from past)memory stored knowledge about things in the world o Most directly related to storage - Organization of semantic memory: individual concepts represented as “nodes” in memory network (neural networks) o Concepts/nodes that are semantically associated are interconnected differs between people (depending on individual interpretation/experience) o Degree of semantic relatedness between 2 concepts is represented by strength of the interconnection between their nodes - When one concept is activated, activation “spreads” to other concepts whose nodes have strong interconnections with activated node - Evidence for network organization semantic priming Lexical decision task – 2 letter strings shown in succession (some words, some non-words) are both strings words? (Yes or no)  Response time faster if the 2 letter-strings are related to each other - Limits of spreading activation: activated nodes have a fixed capacity for emitting activation more interconnections that node has = less activation spread to any interconnected node o Evidence = Fan effect Fan effect – learn set of sentences 1 association = i.e. the doctor is in the bank; 2 associations = i.e. the lawyer is in the park, and the lawyer is in the church o Recognition test = was this sentence in the learning set? Oct. 18, 2012 – MISSED LECTURE - (video) amnesic Mike hippocampus damage = memories before injury retained; almost incomplete inability to add new memories o Other cognitive abilities intact o Car accident = back fracture medical complications = 24 hr seizure coma for 2 wks  2 min. seizure few weeks later coma for 2 wks again = damage to hippocampus (not complete damage if were complete, wouldn’t even know he had amnesia) o Writes everything down in detail o Hippocampus + other structures consolidates memory Long-term potentiation (LTP; electric phenomenon in hippocampus) – reflects hippocampus’ role in memory’s consolidation  Similarly in cerebral cortex  How memories are stored in the brain - (video) amnesic Leonard (fictional) can’t form new long-term memories, can’t remember anything from past, and can only rely on short-term memory Amnesia – caused by head injury, cerebral vascular incident (i.e. stroke), epilectic activity, electroconvulsive therapy, neurosurgery, tumors, chronic alcohol abuse, Alzheimer’s disease, etc. Anterograde amnesia – inability to learn new things or remember info learned after onset of amnesia; can’t create new long-term memories always re-introduced to people Retrograde amnesia – difficulty in remembering events that occurred before onset of amnesia  In reality doesn’t work as smoothly (?) o With head injury, often both anterograde and retrograde amnesia recovers with time (temporary)  Permanent loss of memory for events preceding injury (retrograde) and occurring during time of anterograde ???  Symptoms not limited to memory loss st - Figure ???  Case study: how memory loss happens in case of severe head trauma (1 line = 5 mnths after; 2 = 8 mnths after; 3 = 16 mnths after) - HM was severe epileptic whose seizures originated in medial temporal lobe had bilateral medial temporal lobectomy (neurosurgery, 1950’s) to stop seizures o Surgery successful in terms of curing seizures, but caused severe anterograde amnesia o got severe anterograde amnesia + retrograde amnesia for 3 yrs before surgery (totally lost 3 yrs of his past after surgery) Korsakoff’s syndrome – chronic alcohol abuse can lead to vitamin B1 (thiamine) deficiency causes brain damage, esp. In areas involved in memory (anterograde and retrograde amnesia) Alzheimer’s disease – winder range of memory impairments than other amnesic populations o steady deterioration, with memory impairment in early stages being followed by other cognitive impairments (cognitive consequences) o may not just affect long-term memory; more wide spread = more wide spread damage - cognitive psychologists interested in amnesia because assume memory = too complex to be single process in info-processing model (i.e. short-term vs. long-term memory) double dissociations o single memory system if damaged = first thing to go is long-term memory because it’s more challenging o P1 = no memory process A, but memory process B i.e. short-term memory intact , but long-term memory not  P2 = memory process A, but no memory process B i.e. long-term memory intact but short-term not  P3 = no memory process A or B (widespread brain damage affecting multiple
More Less

Related notes for PSYC 2650

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit