Class Notes (836,278)
Canada (509,737)
Sociology (4,077)
SOC219H5 (123)
Lecture 2

Lecture 2 Notes.docx

10 Pages
47 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Sociology
Course
SOC219H5
Professor
Nicole Myers
Semester
Summer

Description
Lecture 2 May-8-13 9:07 PM Issues in the Criminal Justice Policy Understanding Public Opinion on Sentence Severity  What do ordinary Canadians ‘mean’ when they say ‘Sentences are too lenient’?  Concern about the legitimacy of the criminal justice system  Does “knowing” that the public feels this way mean that sentences should be made more harsh? Understanding Public Attitudes  What are people being told about sentence severity? o What are they comparing to?  What offences are people thinking about? o Worst case scenario  Estimates of recidivism(reoffend) rates = (overestimate)  Reasons for wanting harsher sentences (utilitarian goals: belief that are effective way of reducing crime) o What they wanted to get out of it  Nature of information available to people  Costs and opportunity costs of imprisonment o More money spent punishing people means less money going else where o 1 year in provincial institution = $172/day, $61,000/person o Average household salary o 1 year in Federal institution = $357, $130,000/person News media coverage  Comparison of court based information vs. newspaper information. o Newspaper information  63% judged sentence as too lenient o Court documents  19% thought sentence too lenient  Give people information about costs o People think its lenient  Remind people of the fact that the offender will be released  What makes a good news story about a ‘routine’ case? o Make sentence look wrong  Probably not just news media Public Attitudes and Broader Policies  Knowledge of ability of the sanction to accomplish the goal (e.g., general deterrence).  When asked about best way to prevent crime? o Canadians favour ‘social’ approaches over harsh sentences ( ) o Problem:  People want results NOW  If want to see outcome, you have to wait 20, 30, 40 years to see impact  Desire for an appropriate ‘response’ to offending Research Example (Case Study)  Cases presented to ordinary people to ‘sentence’ in which actual sentence appeared to be lenient  Workers in 32 workplaces (Australia)  70 minute talk about sentencing (legal principles, etc.)  Judge presented sentencing judgment without information on sentence, or possible range.  Results  3 of 4 cases median sentence less than actual; 4 – 35% more lenient.  Once given more context/knowledge, they were more likely to think:  The sentence is about right  Criminal justice system IS capable of meeting the needs of the victims  Respects the rights of the accused  Treats people fairly  Criminal justice system is more effective in bringing people who have committed crimes before the court and holding them accountable - imposing a level of justice  Huge variation across cases General Conclusion: Public Opinion  Simple questions --> simple answers  Dangerous place if we ask simple questions and make large criminal justice policies on basis of this  Knowledge and opinion  And impact knowledge has on formation of the informed of an opinion  If we clarify things, dramatically changes peoples' perceptions  Caution on what ‘opinion’ means  Relationship between policy and public opinion Summary  Criminal Justice System -  Complex organization  Parts interact (not independent) – press release  Focus of the course: empirical evidence.  Need to evaluate evidence (not simply accept assertions)  Need to be careful about what can be generalized (e.g., across countries)  How should we design „criminal justice policy‟?  Large number of relatively specialized bills – little overall „theory‟ How do we assess public views of the criminal justice system Complexities that need to be considered: Criminal Justice and Governments  Federal Government Law and Provincial Territorial Governments Administration of Justice).  Ordinary Policing  OPP in Ontario  Toronto, Peel, Halton  But RCMP‟s various roles (Federal police, and „contract‟)  Federal role (e.g., police information systems)  Courts  Administration (provinces)  Courts and Judges 
More Less

Related notes for SOC219H5

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit