CSE 215 Lecture 11: Midterm Review

50 views5 pages

Document Summary

If the proof begins with forall x and does not give us a p(x), we cannot do the step where we assume. The difference of the squares of two consecutive integers is odd. Gupta believes we will make a mistake here (formalizing) Aka take any x, if we have two consecutive numbers, Since there is no p(x), we cannot assume anything. [(x+1)2 - x2] = (x2 + 2x + 1) - x2 = 2x + 1. (2x+1) is odd, since x is an integer. For all integers a, b, and c, if a|b and a|c then a|(2b-3c) Forall a,b,c, if (a|b and a|c) then a|(2b-3c). We know that a divides b and a divides c are both true. By definition, a|b implies that b = ar for some integer r. By definition, a|c implies that c = as for some integer s.

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents