LAW 792 Lecture Notes - Lecture 34: San Francisco, Antonin Scalia, Thurgood Marshall

• School: University of Illinois
• Department: Law
• Course: LAW 792
• Professor: Perkins

Document Summary

The party wishes to permit citizen x to participate but the state demands his exclusion (pp. Tashjian v. republican party of connecticut, 479 u. s. 208 (1986) (pp. : professor lowenstein suggests that conflict in cases like. Tashjian might look like party-organization versus party-in-government and therefore less judicial deference is required: both should be subject to political give-and-take (5) party raiding and registration deadlines: in rosario v. rockefeller (us 1973), Court upheld ny law requiring voters to enroll in party of choice at least 30 days before general election in november in order to vote in the next subsequent closed party primary. When can the government regulate a party"s internal affairs (pp. Eu v. san francisco county democratic central committee, 489 u. s. 214 (1989) (pp. : ca argued that strict scrutiny was not required because two major parties agreed and could have changed through general legislative process, but.