LLB160 Lecture Notes - Lecture 12: Elitism, Inferiority Complex, Paternalism
Document Summary
Today legal storytelling is a radical challenge to that as it has allowed for a far greater interpretation of the human condition. Today a lot more intertwined with the human condition. Storytelling as a way of applying the law judges in. Set out paragraph as if audience doesn"t know - Traditionally the law was this but has progressive to this to allow. In conclusion, it is the role of stories to do abc and in doing so radicalises traditional approaches to legal thinking and writing. Traditionally, judges are perceived to be impartial decision-makers. Further academia sarmas legal storytelling is a recent addition to case of l v d case development sarmas article below. Thus, the use of narrative in judicial decision-making has challenged the impartiality of the judiciary. Rise in judicial paternalism one story had to be privilgeded over another. It is the role of outsiders" stories, in challenging dominant legal discourse, to achieve progressive legal change.
