LLB170 Lecture 2: LLB 170 wk 2 Interpreting Express Terms
Document Summary
Dick bentley productions v harold smith (p 433) Mount bruce mining pty ltd v wright prospecting pty ltd. Royal botanic gardens and domain trust v south sydney city council. Brambles holdings v bathurst city council - focusing on those parts of the judgment dealing with construing the terms of a contract. (ii) construing exclusion clauses. What have the parties by their words (written and or oral) promised one another as part of their contract: identifying the express terms, interpreting/construing the express terms, identifying the express terms. By signing a (cid:449)(cid:396)itte(cid:374) do(cid:272)u(cid:373)e(cid:374)t (cid:894)l(cid:859)est(cid:396)a(cid:374)ge; toll; cu(cid:396)tis(cid:895) By displaying or delivering a written document (oceanic; thorton; baltic) By a course of dealing between parties (balmain; rinaldi) Found in statements made by the parties during their pre-contractual negotiations. If contract is wholly in writing consider effect of parol evidence rule and options available to get around that rule (sra v heath outdoors, masterton homes, shepard, Or is it just mere puff? (carlill)
