POLY1000 Lecture Notes - Lecture 6: Health Policy, Public Health, Aust

30 views11 pages
11 May 2018
School
Department
Course
Lecture 6 - Health & Disability
Review:
Which level of govt has the primary responsibility for delivering education in Australia?
state + fed
what source provides the greatest level of funding, on average per student to Catholic
schools?
Federal
Nous groups description of compounding effects of concentrations of disadvantage in
schooling
Diagram in textbook/on slides
Learning objectives:
different ways of conceptualising health:
Biomedical
social determinants
human right
who + what health pol involves
institutional + funding arrangement
Implications of a two-tiered system
Dominant themes in Aust health pol:
these feed into + shape our policies
the crisis narrative:
current or predicted future failures of the health system
Common stories:
Public hospitals cannot cope with demand
shortages of health professionals
entire health system threatened by demographic changes (ageing pop)
silver bullet narrative:
scientific advances + breakthroughs will help to save + improve lives
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 11 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
what is health policy?
Financial arrangements determining who pays for what
persistent arguments between powerful interest groups that leave the less powerful
without a say
ideas (debates) about what health actually means
-> what health policy actually includes
Lewis (textbook):
who pays + for what signifies to what extent health is seen to be a public good
who has power in health policy debates indiciates who has the ability to influence the
health policy process
different perceptions about health
Dominant discourses:
Biomedicine
body as a machine that sometimes breaks downed needs to be fixed
key concepts:
Disease + other malaises, such as disabilities, are deviations from normal
biological functioning
assessment + intervention is focused on addressing + correcting the malfunction
rather than adapting the environment
Diseases and malaises are causes by specific agents of processes
biological explanations are privileged over understanding the associated social
patterning
universal nature of diseases, regardless of culture, time + place
fails to acknowledge cultural + historical variations that affect understanding +
experience of disease and how it is addressed
medicine as a scientifically neutral enterprise
positivist, non-biased, scientific evidence is valued
Implications:
creates experts and expertise associate with biology -> power conferred on
medical practitioners
use of biomedical terminology re normal and abnormal
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 11 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Individualistic, curative interventions are prioritised
allocation of funding - e.g. lung cancer gets less funding because it can be seen as
the result of some peoples individual actions
Social determinants & public health
recognises underlying social, economic + political causes of poor health
Wilkinson + Marmot:
close relationship between living + working conditions and health outcomes =
renewed appreciation of health being impacted by social environment
factors such as income, education, conditions of employment, power and social
support either strengthen or undermine health
diagram on PP
individual lifestyle factors
age, sex and constitutional actors
Social + community networks
General socio-economic, cultural and environmental conditions
e.g. education, unemployment, health care services, housing
Implications:
more preventive approach -> focus on protecting and promoting the health of
communities
in contrast to individualistic + curative
old public health = quarantine, sewerage disposal, provision of clean water, food
safety, immunisation
new public health = community involvement and focus on addressing social
determinants of health
who is involved?
diverse + inclusive team needed, should involve those whose help we are
trying to improve
working with not doing to
Conceptual Framework for Australias Health
**on PP**
Considers health to be multidimensional, defining health in according with WHO
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 11 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Nous group(cid:1685)s description of compounding effects of concentrations of disadvantage in schooling. Biomedical social determinants human right who + what health pol involves institutional + funding arrangement. Dominant themes in aust health pol: these feed into + shape our policies the (cid:1684)crisis(cid:1685) narrative: current or predicted future failures of the health system. Financial arrangements determining who pays for what persistent arguments between powerful interest groups that leave the less powerful without a say ideas (debates) about what (cid:1684)health(cid:1685) actually means. Biomedicine body as a machine that sometimes breaks downed needs to be fixed key concepts: Disease + other malaises, such as disabilities, are deviations from normal biological functioning assessment + intervention is focused on addressing + correcting the malfunction rather than adapting the environment. Implications: creates experts and expertise associate with biology -> power conferred on medical practitioners use of biomedical terminology re (cid:1688)normal(cid:1689) and (cid:1688)abnormal(cid:1689)

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers