LLB180 Lecture Notes - Lecture 10: Ted Honderich, Mandatory Sentencing, Eye For An Eye
Document Summary
An evil or unpleasantness inflicted on the deserving offender for an offence by a personal agency autho(cid:396)ised (cid:271)(cid:455) the i(cid:374)stitutio(cid:374) (cid:449)ho(cid:859)s rules have been broken by the offence. Ted ho(cid:374)de(cid:396)i(cid:272)h (cid:862)a(cid:374) autho(cid:396)it(cid:455)(cid:859)s i(cid:374)fli(cid:272)tio(cid:374) of a pe(cid:374)alt(cid:455) o(cid:374) a(cid:374) offe(cid:374)de(cid:396)(cid:863) Punishment differentiated from arbitrary exercise of power. Gallen how the state treats you in a moral sense how the state interacts with the individual. Necessity as a means of making the standards of the criminal law real. Crimes (sentencing procedure) act 1999 s 3a purposes of sentencing. Debt owed to society b eliminate their unfair advantage. Punishment proportionate to the gravity of the offence. Assumes that offenders are rational beings who will desist from criminal activity if the consequences of their actions are perceived to be sufficiently severe. Assumes potential offenders know the law and its consequences. That they engage in rational calculations and are not subject to irrational emotion.