CHST 1000 Lecture 3: CHST1000B.Final Paper Grading Rubric Grid
9 Apr 2016
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
The paper is merely descriptive with little to no analysis. An attempt has been made to add supporting information, but it was unrelated or confusing. Compelling parts of both the textbook and 5 well-researched, appropriate, peer- reviewed secondary sources representing 2 different disciplinary approaches are quoted and/or paraphrased in ways that strengthen the author s analysis. Content and analysis are generally sound but could be more specific or insightful in some areas. The textbook and/or secondary sources have minor weaknesses relative to analysis and/or support of the topic/subject. Peer reviewed sources may be missing or do not represent 2 different disciplinary approaches. Content is weak and the paper stays mainly at the level of observation or description and fails to get to the level of analysis. Supporting information from the textbook and/or secondary sources may be missing, or have major weaknesses relative to analysis and/or support of the topic/subject. (7-9 points) (13-15 points)
