PHIL 2550 Lecture Notes - Lecture 9: Moral Authority

• School: Carleton University
• Department: Philosophy
• Course: PHIL 2550
• Professor: Joshua Shepard

Document Summary

Theory- (cid:271)ased; issue; (cid:272)a(cid:374)(cid:859)t e(cid:454)pe(cid:272)t agree(cid:373)e(cid:374)t (cid:271)ased o(cid:374) the theories. Value- based; try to appeal to values that everyone shares. Double move, from pain to hope for payback. One of her ideas must be = anger puts us in the grip of a bad moral metaphysics. 2] retri(cid:271)utio(cid:374) pla(cid:455)s i(cid:374)to a (cid:271)ad (cid:373)oral (cid:373)etaph(cid:455)si(cid:272)s of (cid:858)(cid:272)os(cid:373)i(cid:272) fit(cid:374)ess(cid:859) The angry person has three options: she goes down the path of status- focus, seeing the events as about her/ her rank. In that case her project makes sense, but her normative focus is self- centered and narrow: focus on the original offense, thinking the suffering of the wrongdoer will (cid:373)ake thi(cid:374)gs (cid:271)etter. This thi(cid:374)ki(cid:374)g does(cid:374)(cid:859)t (cid:373)ake se(cid:374)se: you can turn to the future, focus on doing whatever would be helpful. This could include punishment, but in a deterrent rather than retaliatory spirit. The reasons that justify sport-hatred must mirror the reasons that justify hatred in real life.