PSCI 3601 Lecture Notes - Lecture 5: Wage Labour, Dependency Theory, Class Conflict

21 views3 pages
Marxism and Critical Theory
Lecture 5
Marxist IR theory is not related to communism nor the Soviet Union
But: critical analysis of international politics focusing on social relations and processes of
production especially capitalism
Origins: writings of K. Marx and F. Engles
Current relevance: globalization, global crisis of capitalism.
Capitalism:
means of production = privately owned
labor = a commodity (“free” wage labor as compulsion)
surplus value of labor = private property of capitalists
Two key ideas of (orthodox) Marxism:
Materialism (material base determines
political, legal, etc. superstructure)
Dialectic dynamic of society in contradiction/crisis
(esp. coop. production vs. private appropriation of capital)
crisis = “danger and opportunity” (Gill)
Classes and States
Actors in international relations are defined by class relations
Conceptions of the states and by extension, IGOs, and NGOs
- instrument of capitalists
(“executive committee of the bourgeoisie”)
- structure guaranteeing the stability of capitalism
(relative autonomy of the state)
- Premise: civil society prior to the state (cf. liberalism)
Challenge to realist and liberal assumptions of the
autonomy of actors
Human nature: labor and variability
Human beings are producers and (good?)
Human nature is variable (i.e. subject to conditions of production/ historical “relations in
process,” Rupert, p. 129)
Human nature is not explanatory; but practical stance: human emancipation
Freedom as social self determination, Rupert, p. 130).
Marxism and the (not so) inter-national system (anarchy and interdependence)
Capitalism global from its inception
Capitalist Markets: anarchy (competition, struggle) and interdependence (divison of
labor).
- International relations
= class struggle+ universal interdependence of nations (Marx and Engles).
Class hierarchy not anarchy: dependency theory and world system theory
Class structure (capitalists vs. proletariat) in the int’l system:
dominant “core” states vs. dependent “peripheries”
Dependency theory
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows page 1 of the document.
Unlock all 3 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Marxist ir theory is not related to communism nor the soviet union. But: critical analysis of international politics focusing on social relations and processes of production especially capitalism. Origins: writings of k. marx and f. engles. Capitalism: means of production = privately owned labor = a commodity ( free wage labor as compulsion) surplus value of labor = private property of capitalists. Dialectic dynamic of society in contradiction/crisis (esp. coop. production vs. private appropriation of capital) political, legal, etc. superstructure: crisis = danger and opportunity (gill) Classes and states: actors in international relations are defined by class relations, conceptions of the states and by extension, igos, and ngos instrument of capitalists ( executive committee of the bourgeoisie ) structure guaranteeing the stability of capitalism. Premise: civil society prior to the state (cf. liberalism) Challenge to realist and liberal assumptions of the (relative autonomy of the state) autonomy of actors.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents