COMM 315 Lecture Notes - Lecture 18: Canadian Tire, Cott, Jacuzzi
1 Feb 2017
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Court agrees with giroux on almost all claims (was successful) Misrepresentation 1400 1401 c. c. q. (withheld information about the fact that a house can"t be built on the land) Judge grants giroux ,000 for legal fees, stress, inconvenience and costs + the original ,000 that giroux had paid for the land. Paid 200,000 for a restaurant who had a deficit of 6,235. Contract has illegal purpose, it is not valid anymore (invalid) since it included a bargain whereby they would be defrauding the government of the taxes that they owed. Court shouldn"t allow such a contract to be inforced. Court decides not fair for one party to benefit from another in a case like this. One of them should not profit unduly from an illegal contract. Court determines that fiasche reimburse 133,501 with interest and the additional indemnity under article 1619 c. c. q. Carrefour langelier (plaintiff) vs. cineplex odeon corp. (defendant) Landlord agrees, as long as everything is advertised as cineplex.
