PUB2 101D1 Lecture Notes - Lecture 10: Brian Dickson, Marshall Rothstein, Beverley Mclachlin

• School: McGill University
• Department: Public Law 2
• Course: PUB2 101D1
• Professor: Mark Walters

Document Summary

The very first step of the analysis under freedom of association is whether the infringement is substantial! One of the reasons that the ndp supported the charter initially was the view that a constitutional protection of freedom of association would protect union activities forming unions, collective bargaining, striking, picketing etc. Until recently, this was not at all the case. It seems to me that it boils down to saying you can form a hockey team, but you can"t play hockey. justice cromwell from the bench in mpao. All that changed here is a description from of the change from rothstein and wagner jj. "s dissent in saskatchewan federation of labour: In the labour trilogy, this court firmly rejected the proposition that the right to strike in canada is constitutionally entrenched (the. Alberta reference ); psac v. canada, [1987]; rwdsu v. saskatchewan, [1987] (collectively, the labour trilogy )).