PHIL 2100 Lecture Notes - Lecture 12: Modus Tollens, Modus Ponens, Logical Reasoning
27 Apr 2016
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
20 questions: almost all multiple choice. Asking what principle it is maybe fallacy. Going to be just like the weekly exercises. 2. : true or false question, supply the missing premise or conclusion in the argument he will give. 3-4. : diagram the arguments, leave out extraneous information, number the statements you use in the passage. 5-8. : determine whether or not a fallacy has been committed in each of the following cases. 9-12. : symbolize the arguments, in each case determine the argument form (modus ponens, modus tollens, disjunctive syllogism, fallacy of denying the antecedent or fallacy of affirming the consequent. 13. : state whether you accept or reject the reasoning in the argument explain your answer. Why you would not accept principles from argument analysis. Look at premises and the conclusions from the premises: ex. ) Good argument premises are valid and lead to the conclusion. Questions they would ask in an lsat.
