Class Notes (838,584)
Canada (510,969)
Psychology (3,977)
PSYC 2330 (214)
Lecture 18

Thursday, Nov 8/2012 - Lecture 18

5 Pages
80 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC 2330
Professor
Francesco Leri
Semester
Fall

Description
Thursday, November 8/2012 PSYC 2330 Lecture 18 Escape and avoidance are forms of? a. positive reinforcement b. negative reinforcement c. punishment d. omission e. it depends on the context I answer e Positive Punishment • Positive punishment means the presentation of stimulus that reduces the frequency of behaviour • Presentation of an aversive stimulus • Correction comes in when an unwanted behaviour surfaces • Punishment has an impact on the way an organism feels • Often simply referred to as punishment Is Punishment Effective? • Lever pressing in rats ◦ Cummulative responsive, once the line is flat, it means that respoding has stopped ◦ The steeper the slope, the faster the response rate ◦ Skinner trained rats to lever press for sucrose ◦ Tried to enhance the effect of extinction by adding punishment ◦ Punishment was administered only at the beginning of the session ◦ Punishment was slapping the paw of the rat for touching the lever ◦ Punishment group showed less responding at first than the control group (ie. On the first day only) ◦ Punishment group showed equal responding to the control group after the first day ◦ Punishment only had a temporary effect on reducing behaviour, not a permanent one • Same experiment performed with foot shock instead of paw slapping ◦ Shock strength is varied to change the intensity of the punishment ◦ From this study, it was concluded that punishment was effective, but it has to be at the correct intensity ◦ However, does this experiment show that the animal learned anything? ▪ No, the animal cannot perform any behaviour when they have received that intense a shock (>120V) • Self-injurious behaviour in humans ◦ Attempting to modify self-injurious behaviours in children withAutism, childhood schitzophrenia etc... ◦ Children can die from self-destructive behaviour ◦ Child was given a mild foot shock each time they perform a self-destructive behaviour ◦ In this case, punishment worked ◦ The behaviour was extreme, which is why the extreme route was allowed to be tried ◦ Numbers represent the person in the room, 1 always represents the same experimenter ◦ At first, the child associates the shock with the person who gave it to them ◦ When the experimenter who gave the child the shock is not in the room, the behaviour returns ◦ The child must experience the foot shock from multiple experimenters in order for it to generalize • Many of the original experiments about punishment come from Skinner Principles • Intensity ◦ Self-mutilation prevented by intense shocks and then by secondary punishment ◦ The pigeons of Azrin, Holz and Hake (1963): 60 or 80 volts? ▪ Punish pigeons with 80 volts for pecking a light ▪ Not dead, just not pecking ▪ Punished pigeons with 60 volts for pecking a light ▪ Pigeons didn't stop responding ▪ Pigeons given 80 volts after and pigeons didn't top responding ▪ Pigeons continued to peck until given 300 volts ▪ The principle is if you use a mild punishment that doesn't work, the subject becomes tolerant to the punishment and so you have to pursue much higher extremes to stop behaviour ▪ The idea is that if you punish a child and it is too mild, the behaviour will persist and the behaviour will persist until the punishment is much more severe ◦ When the punisher administers the shock, they become a conditioned stimulus to punishment (ie. Conditioned punisher) ◦ Conditioned punisher leads to the lack of behaviour in the presence of the individual/stimuli • Delay ◦ Dogs (Soloman et al., 1968) and children (Aronfreed 1968) ▪ 0 seconds – effective ▪ 5 seconds – not effective ▪ The organism attempts to discern which behaviour led to the punishment ◦ Experiment details from above ^ ▪ Sit with two options beside you ▪ On one side is regular pet valu dog food in large quantities ▪ On the other side is fillet mignon ▪ Led the dog in ▪ If the animal consumed the preferred food, they were punished by being hit with a newspaper ▪ Varied the delay of punishment ▪ Then allowed the animal in the room with no experimenter and measured how long it took for the dog to consume the preferred food ▪ Group that was punished after 15 seconds, the dog ate the preferred food after 3 minutes ▪ Group that was punished after 5 seconds, the dog resisted eating the preferred for 8 days ▪ Group that was punished immediately went without eating the preferred food for 2 weeks • Schedule ◦ Must be continuous schedules ◦ Doesn't work on variable schedules ◦ If you miss a time or two, you have undone all the work done • Stimulus Control ◦ Experimenter effect in Lovaas ◦ eg. When mom is here, she will not approve of eating iced cream, but when dad is here I can eat any amount of iced cream I want • Verbal explanation ◦ If you explain why the punishment was delivered, you can fill the gap between time and punishment ◦ Verbal explanations can help reduce behaviour when administering punishment Side Effects of Punishment • 1. Fear and anxiety ◦ Not clear on the difference between fear and anxiety • 2. Reduced interest ◦ If you have a child that doesn't want to go to dance, punishing them for not wanting to go will make them want to go even less ◦ Punishing for not performing a task will make the task even less interesting • 3. Impaired attention ◦ If you instill fear and anxiety in a subject, they ca
More Less

Related notes for PSYC 2330

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit