Class Notes (1,100,000)
CA (630,000)
UW (20,000)
INTEG (10)

INTEG10 Lecture Notes - Falsifiability, Robert P. Crease, Carl Mitcham

Knowledge Integration
Course Code
Frances Chapman

of 6
INTEG 220, Fall 2012
T, TH 10:00-11:20AM; EV2 2069
Professor: Ted Richards
Office: EV1, 212
Phone: (519) 888-4567 ext.
Office hours: T & Th 11:30-12:30, and by appointment
(Note: You MUST include ‘INTEG 220’ in the subject line of any emails to me!)
Course Description
Calendar Description: This course examines how knowledge is produced in scientific
disciplines, including the nature of inquiry, as well as types of evidence and expertise across
different fields. The course features significant input from scientific practitioners in the form of
guest lectures.
Epistemology is the branch of philosophy that examines the nature of knowledge. While
most epistemology courses focus on ordinary, everyday knowledge (is this a dagger I see before
me?), this course will examine the production and products of disciplinary knowledge (scientific
questions like, from what is this dagger made?). INTEG 220 focuses on epistemological
questions about the natural and physical sciences, while INTEG 221 will emphasize the
humanities and social sciences (and, in particular, the social nature of knowledge).
The course includes multiple cycles of (1) reading and discussing philosophical theories of
scientific knowledge, (2) listening to and interviewing a guest lecturer about the nature of
knowledge in his or her discipline, (3) reflecting on the nature of knowledge in that discipline
through discussion and writing. Following the final guest lecturer, you will work in small groups
to synthesize what you have learned by comparing the nature of knowledge in each discipline.
Towards the end of the course, we will discuss two topics interdisciplinarity and scientific
expertise and how they relate to the goals of Knowledge Integration.
Course Objectives
By the end of this course you should be able to do the following:
Explain what epistemology is and identify epistemological issues
Describe philosophical views of the nature of scientific knowledge
Thoughtfully apply an epistemological issue to a scientific discipline
Compare/contrast the nature of knowledge in different disciplines
Critically evaluate an epistemological issue through reflective writing
Transferrable skills:
Improve ability to carefully read and comprehend difficult material
Practice and improve writing skills for different types of assignments
Assess the work of your peers in a constructively critical way
INTEG 220, Fall 2012
Expectations for this Course
This course is intended to be reading-, writing-, and participation-intensive.
We are all expected to:
Attend every class & be on time
Be prepared for lecture & participate
NOTE: All emails must include220 in the
Listen attentively when others speak
subject line!
You are also expected to:
You can also expect me to:
Submit assignments on time, using the
appropriate drop-box on D2L and having
appropriately anonymized your work
Provide directions for each assignment
at least 10 days in advance and allow
time for students’ questions in class
Carefully consider instructor feedback on
written and oral work
Provide timely and helpful feedback on
participation and course assignments
Use scheduled office hours for
consultation (or make an appointment);
use email for less substantive questions
Be available during office hours and via
email; respond to emails within 48
Required Reading Material and Submitting Assignments: D2L
There are no required textbooks for this course; instead, all readings will be posted on D2L.
Please download, print, and bring the readings with you to class. On rare occasions, changes may
be made to the schedule of topics or readings; any changes will be announced in class and on D2L.
Graded work will be evaluated either out of 100 points in 5-point increments (e.g., 75, 80, 85) or
by a √-/√/√+. Each assignment carries a different weight in your course grade. Note: there is no
final exam for this course.
Participation 15%
Attendance, in-class discussion,
Throughout the course
D2L discussion, in-class activities
Assignments 45%
Short Essay #1 (√) Due Tuesday, October 9
Short Essay #2 (√) Due Thursday, October 25
Peer Reviews (√) Due Thursday, November 1
Short Essay #3 (G) Due Thursday, November 8
Compare & contrast (group) 15% Due Thursday, November 15
Final Paper 25%
Topic & outline Due Thursday, November 29
Final paper
Due Tuesday, December 11
INTEG 220, Fall 2012
Participation (15%)
Participation is based on the following components. (Grades will be determined at the end of
the course, but I will provide mid-term evaluations to give you an idea as to how you’re doing.)
Attendance: I will take attendance by passing around a sign-in sheet you are responsible for
signing your name. If you know in advance that you must miss a class, please email me via
D2L. You are allowed 2 unexcused absencesadditional absences will result in a 5-point
deduction from your participation grade for each absence. Frequent late arrivals will also
lower your grade. Students with outstanding attendance records will receive bonus marks
for participation.
In-class discussion & D2L posts: A significant portion of your participation grade will be
based on thoughtful, relevant, and respectful contributions to class discussions. Everyone is
expected to participate in small groups; however, if you are not comfortable sharing in
whole-class discussions, you may do more of your participating on D2L.
In-class assignments/activities: Throughout the semester, there will be a few small activities
or assignments, most of which will take place in class. These will be assessed on a
check/check-plus/check-minus basis, and will go towards your participation grade, unless
otherwise noted.
Assignments (45%)
Below are brief descriptions of each of the assignments (detailed instructions will be provided at
least ten days in advance of the due date). Unless noted otherwise, written assignments are due
by the start of class on the due date and must be submitted in the appropriate drop-box on D2L.
Before submitting a paper, you must remove your name, student number, and any other
identifying marks, and include your randomly assigned number instead.
Short essays: After each series of guest lecture visits, you will need to submit a short essay
(no more tahn 750 words), reflecting on an epistemological issue of your choosing and how
you think it relates to the nature of knowledge in the guest lecturer’s discipline.
Peer reviews: After the 2nd essay has been submitted, each student will receive TWO essays
written by other students to read and assess. Each review should be about 500 words, and
will be shared with their author. (Note: the process will be anonymized so you will not
know whose paper you’re reviewing nor who reviewed your paper.)
Compare/Contrast (15%)
After all the guest lecturers have visited, you will have an opportunity to work in a small group
to reflect on similarities and differences regarding the nature of knowledge in the three
disciplines represented. The grade will be based on a visual (e.g., powerpoint, handout) and a
short in-class presentation.
Final Paper (25%)
In place of a final exam, you will need to write a final paper of approximately 2000 words
(roughly 8 pages double-spaced), on a topic of your choosing. The paper is due at 10am on
Tuesday, December 11th, and must be anonymized and submitted on D2L. You should also
hand in a description of your topic and an outline for your paper by November 29th, which I will
provide feedback on. Failure to hand in a sufficient description/outline will result in a 5-point
decrease on the grade for your final paper.