PACS201 Lecture Notes - Ursula Franklin, Nonviolence, Lunch Counter

35 views3 pages
WEEK 9: NONVIOLENT PERSPECTIVES ON POWER AND SYSTEMATIC CHANGE
1. NONVIOLENT POWER
A. Strategic Dependence on violence: Is it a soluble problem?
*Propositions from the nonviolence paradigm
We are conditioned to associate power with violence
When normal means fail and the objective is a vital one, we feel pressure to endorse
the use of violence
A common result: we end up in a common cycle of violence
Challenge: can we confront stubborn or opportunistic adversaries without resorting to
violence?
“Violence is a form of resourcelessness; in other words, we use violence when we lack
the creativity to come up with a nonviolent solution” (Ursula Franklin)
“If we equate power without ability to hurt, there is no place for peace in this
universe.” – Kenneth Bolding
B. Asymmetric Conflict and Cyclical Violence
Sunday, January 30, 1972, in Derry, Northern Ireland, it was a Bloody Sunday.
-Group of protestors who were objecting to the internment without trial, and the British
army opened fire and 13 people were killed. This is an issue with unequal conflict.
C. Consent Theory of Power
Government is ultimately based on consent/obedience
By withdrawing consent, people can reclaim their power (i.e.: people power)
2. NONVIOLENCE THEORY
A. Reasons to study Nonviolence
It’s cool. It’s interesting. It’s important. It’s empowering. It’s more human.
B. VIOLENCE
Latin: violare; to violate
Our PACS typology: Direct, structural, cultural
Direct Violence can take many different forms
C. Meaning of none violence
Achieving without harm; things that are normally thought to be attainable only through
violence (Curle, in Vellacott, p.104)
Active refusal to use or submit to violence in the pursuit of social change; involves
peaceful confrontations
2.1. Approaches to Nonviolence
Unlock document

This preview shows page 1 of the document.
Unlock all 3 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

*propositions from the nonviolence paradigm: we are conditioned to associate power with violence, when normal means fail and the objective is a vital one, we feel pressure to endorse the use of violence. A common result: we end up in a common cycle of violence. Violence is a form of resourcelessness; in other words, we use violence when we lack the creativity to come up with a nonviolent solution (ursula franklin) If we equate power without ability to hurt, there is no place for peace in this universe. kenneth bolding: asymmetric conflict and cyclical violence. Sunday, january 30, 1972, in derry, northern ireland, it was a bloody sunday. Group of protestors who were objecting to the internment without trial, and the british army opened fire and 13 people were killed. This is an issue with unequal conflict: consent theory of power, government is ultimately based on consent/obedience.

Get access

Grade+
$10 USD/m
Billed $120 USD annually
Homework Help
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
40 Verified Answers
Study Guides
Booster Classes
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Homework Help
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
30 Verified Answers
Study Guides
Booster Classes