Class Notes (837,549)
Canada (510,313)
PSCI 264 (18)
Lecture 4

Week 4 – readings.docx

5 Pages
Unlock Document

Political Science
PSCI 264
Oleg Kodolov

Week 4 – readings 10/10/2013 8:12:00 AM Chapter 8 – Fiorina Research indicates that much of electoral behavior is predictable in advance. Public enters the election period w/attitudes & loyalties mostly in place. Most important: how close the candidates’ values & preferences are to thers. Favours candidates who seek the political center. 1/3 – ½ voters decide on how to vote before the primaries. ½ - 2/3 decide before the fall campaign. Answer: Americans have a longer time horizon than the considerations that dominate news coverage. Emphasize party loyalties & government performance. NOT policy proposals/candidate personalities. Why elections don’t matter: Do not give regular Americans much influence. Discouraged by the performance of political institutions. Legal changes to open up the electoral system – limiting campaign spending, making election laws fairer – would correct flaws. Candidates might not keep their promises – impede voters from voting. Not equipped to assess candidates on policy proposals. Journalists: Bad candidates Unfair media coverage Campaign-finance abuses Why elections matter: Matter more in US today than ever before Naturally skeptical based on the opposite diagnosis. Good performance by gov’t suggests competent leadership. Voters vote for the same candidate again – why fix something that isn’t broke. Party identification – person’s subjective feeling of affiliation with a party. Two-thirds view themselves as Democrats or Republicans. Strong view point similar to religious view. Learned in childhood, not as flexible, resistant to change. Partisanship responds but gradually. Makes elections much more predictable. Yellow-dog Democrats – Civil War. People wouldn’t vote for a republican even if the Democrat nominee was a yellow dog. Strong party affiliation. Democratic groups – African-Americans, urbanites, Catholics traditionally. Republican groups – wealthy, rural residents, southerners, white protestants-evangelicals especially traditionally. Gender gap – divided the political preferences of men & women. NOT resultant from “women’s issues” – abortion – which were viewed similarly by both genders. Resultant of: Long-standing gender differences over the use of force & responsibility of gov’t to address social ills. i.e. favour death penalty, diffic
More Less

Related notes for PSCI 264

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.