JUST*2020 Lecture Notes - Lecture 14: Actus Reus, Theory Of Justification, Canada Women'S National Soccer Team

10 views7 pages
19 May 2020
School
Department
Course
Professor

Document Summary

Justifications and excuses are defences to criminal and civil liability, this article is about the distinction between these two defences, a distinction which, while familiar, remains controversial. This is because conspiracy presupposes two wills, whereas for the purpose of conspiracy the law views husband and wife as forming one person and consequently sharing but one will: but this is doubtful. For the concept of a bar to successful prosecution also includes bars that are not in any sense defences at all, such as the death of a key eyewitness, or the loss or destruction of crucial evidence. Although such happenings might make successful prosecution impossible it would be odd to call them defences: but even this list of defences is not exhaustive. Philosophy of criminal law mentions at least eight: intoxication, automatism, physical compulsion and impossibility, mistake of fact, mistake of law, duress, provocation and necessity: take duress and necessity.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents