PSY 1101 Lecture Notes - Lecture 1: Dogma, Argument Clinic, Red Meat

• School: University of Ottawa
• Department: Psychology
• Course: PSY 1101
• Professor: Brenda Baird

Document Summary

The argument clinic arguments ii: the(cid:396)e (cid:272)a(cid:374) (cid:271)e a(cid:396)gu(cid:373)e(cid:374)ts about anything, social issues. E. g. , abortion, saving social security, tax cuts, the causes of crime, whether violence on tv is harmful, whether stem cell research should be permitted. There are arguments about what the results show and about what to do in their light. : personal issues. Where to go to school, what field to major in, which party to go to friday night: other issues. E. g. , should teachers grade on a curve, is eating red meat really bad for you, etc. Arguments iii: o(cid:374) a(cid:374)(cid:455) of these issues, (cid:455)ou (cid:272)a(cid:374) (cid:272)o(cid:374)side(cid:396) so(cid:373)e premises (or reasons) and then draw a conclusion, o(cid:396) (cid:455)ou (cid:373)a(cid:455) hea(cid:396) so(cid:373)eo(cid:374)e else"s a(cid:396)gu(cid:373)e(cid:374)t o(cid:374) the topi(cid:272) a(cid:374)d then think about that argument. O, (cid:449)e (cid:449)ill ha(cid:448)e ou(cid:396) (cid:449)o(cid:396)k (cid:272)ut out fo(cid:396) us . Rational reactions i: o(cid:373)eo(cid:374)e (cid:272)a(cid:374) (cid:271)e selectively credulous or contradictory they may only accept arguments from certain people.