Class Notes (839,194)
Canada (511,223)
Psychology (4,237)
PSY346H5 (84)
Lecture

lecture24.doc

2 Pages
81 Views

Department
Psychology
Course Code
PSY346H5
Professor
Gabrielle Sauter

This preview shows 80% of the first page. Sign up to view the full 2 pages of the document.
Description
Lecture# 24 Social Psychology (Part III) Ÿ How our behaviour changes with the presences of real or imaginary people Ÿ Conformity and authority are the two key social components Ÿ Conformity is a change in a belief or behaviour as a result of real or imagined group pressure, the key feature and its influences on behaviour, is the group pressure Ÿ Earliest work done on conformity is Sherif (also did study on camp) Ÿ Sherif took exploited the auto kinetic effect, if you were put in a room with no light except one spot o flight, there is a visible illusion, we will see the stationary spot in the darkened room to move, our eyes are jumping around all the time, moving around to focus on something, which causes the still and stationary object to seem to move Ÿ Sherif would bring individuals in room and ask them how much the spot moves, first everyone’s response was different, then soon everyone converges to a certain distance (individual) Ÿ Then he brought in groups of three and the individuals had to disclose what they saw, and in the same way the original estimates jumped all over the place then converged to a particular value, in the group context, all three appear to see the same spot move in the same direction and distance=convergence, individuals adapting to a collective frame of reference, a perspective that is shared by all group members (convergence=conformity) Ÿ Critics said this was not easy problem to solve, and it may be a collaboration of individuals in an attempt to solve an ambiguous problem (collaborating rather than colluding) Ÿ If a group o people facing relatively simple tasks and the group is giving an incorrect answer, what would you do in that instance, provide your correct answer? Or go along? = SolomonAsch Ÿ Asch ran 720 trials of his paradigm and people only got it wrong 3 times, its very easy (line task) Ÿ He would bring participants in groups and you would find yourself on a line and second to last or last on the line, and your really the only participant, everyone else is a research assistant (but you don’t know that) Ÿ Everyone goes down the line and says which answer they think is correct, and what happens if everyone gives the wrong answer, what happens to your behaviour then Ÿ When doing this individually, accuracy is 99%, but in group situations, 75% will give an incorrect answer as well, start conforming with the incorrect response Ÿ 25% resisted pressure to conform, in spite of the fact that everyone argued otherwise Ÿ Power of a group to alter our beliefs and behaviour and even agree in a clearly incorrect response in a task that you didn’t get rewarded or punished for, just have to say what you think Ÿ Certain things affect conformity, first is the level of task difficulty, sometimes he made the tasks more simple or more difficult, when the level of difficulty is more difficult, the more likely you are to rely on the perceptions of other people, and conformity decreases as the task gets easier Ÿ The size of a majority you need in order to gain conformity, one person is not enough, rates of conformity needs at least more than 3 people to increase agreement Ÿ Unanimity is key, if there is one person before you must be unanimously wrong, because even if one other person sees what you see, then conformity decreases dramatically, they must be in sync Ÿ Another key feature is that your responses have to be public, if your allowed to respond privately, or write your answer down, you become more conscientious and accurate in your answer Ÿ Obedience and conformity not the see thing, conformity involves changes in your behaviour ina response to reciprocal behaviours of peers, group norm of relatively equal status Ÿ Obedience involves change of belief or behaviour in result of different status, authority to someone higher than you in a hierarchy, to behave in the way they want you to Ÿ Obedience to authority studies by Stanley Milgram, he was influenced by how WWII happened, a common explanation was that Germans are different, they have a character flaw and cannot stand up to authority, weak of character, which is the only way the obeyed Hitler Ÿ So Milgram tried to test how pe
More Less
Unlock Document

Only 80% of the first page are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit