SOC301H5 Lecture Notes - Lecture 4: Surety, Risk Aversion, Solitary Confinement
Document Summary
January 25, 2017: 12 and conditions in prison. Sauve v canada: ca(cid:374)"t (cid:271)e (cid:862)te(cid:373)porar(cid:455) out(cid:272)asts fro(cid:373) our s(cid:455)ste(cid:373) of rights a(cid:374)d de(cid:373)o(cid:272)ra(cid:272)(cid:455)(cid:863, symbolic punishment; not about deterrence, not about safety and security. Judicial deference to correctional authorities: safety and security institution. Solitary confinement: small cell, 23hours, little human contact, effects. Cognitive issues-memory loss and impulsiveness: 2011-2012: 16% (cid:862)(cid:448)olu(cid:374)tar(cid:455)(cid:863)-want to be away from general population, afraid of their own safety; 2% punishment. 81%- administrative-> good order of the institution. It is(cid:374)"t i(cid:374)defi(cid:374)ite, ad(cid:373)i(cid:374)istrati(cid:448)e segregatio(cid:374) is differe(cid:374)t fro(cid:373) a(cid:374)d (cid:374)ot analogous to the concept of solitary confinement. Foi: manitoba-> woman prisoners were in overflow. Bacon(bc) 2010: surrey 6- 1st degree murders, pre-trial was cruel and unusual punishment -cup, arbitrary depravations-not allowed to use pen bc could use it as weapon, 1. No deference to correctional decision-(cid:373)aki(cid:374)g; (cid:449)e" k(cid:374)o(cid:449) (cid:449)hat"s (cid:271)est to (cid:373)ai(cid:374)tai(cid:374) prisons. Judge suggested a reduced sentence for these inhuman conditions. Normalized and routine: prison becomes normalized.
